Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: County league football 2013...interesting questions

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by harcohorns View Post
    OLI.. I think your looking at this the wrong way... Pretty sure the man wanted to reply hell yeah Milford Mill will continue to dominate but refrained from such bravado as it would upset some people... just my take
    I took it exactly how I think he meant it.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agentorange View Post
    You know something that has really confounded me was that Noone has ever really said what happned to EVT...I mean, there was a huge drop off in what many considered to be the best Public school program in the metro area...
    I think it was a few things:

    1. The last couple of freshman classes were not very strong. Very competitve and hard to get into the school. Also the school has no control over who gets in and it goes to a complete lottery. So the magnets in the county dont know what they get until the kids come in for summer workouts.

    2. With the above and moving up to a much more competitve 3A was the perfect storm. Not only moving up to 3A, but a 3A that was very strong for once. There were many strong teams in the County 3A 4A league the past couple of seasons. That usually does not happen.

    I think that ET is much better suited with 2A football. Many believe that full magnets have an advantage, but I think they are at a disadvantage. I am a parent of a former graduate and still know much about the school. The coaches are all the same and the work ethic is astounding but the talent pool has dropped a little. With that said ETs JV was pretty good and had some good players and I believe that the Varsity will make some noise for the next couple of years at the 2A level.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agentorange View Post
    Posters forget about Franklin because not too many folks are sure as to what they do to achieve success
    AO,what does that mean,I'm confussed?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Randallstown, MD USA
    Posts
    8,366

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Outside Looking In View Post
    Uh Oh. Trouble in paradise?
    People love to stir the pot around here

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJGreg1200 View Post
    People love to stir the pot around here
    Not stirring the pot, just putting my reply to your vague answer. It is all good.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Owings Mills Maryland
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Hereford didnt look very good last season. They will be a good county team...I dont see them making any noise outside of 695

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob A. View Post
    AO,what does that mean,I'm confussed?
    each and every year...Franklin manages to over achieve for the most part..but we never really know why...or what is the secret to their success...not sure how else to put it

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by agentorange View Post
    each and every year...Franklin manages to over achieve for the most part..but we never really know why...or what is the secret to their success...not sure how else to put it
    AO you really need to get back out there and watch these games! Franklin overachieved? You can't f'ing be serious! Not only did they not overachieve last year, they completely underachieved! They were stacked last year and were definitely the fastest public team in the state and one of the fastest period. Milford Mill overachieved, not Franklin!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GREYHOUND ALUM View Post
    AO you really need to get back out there and watch these games! Franklin overachieved? You can't f'ing be serious! Not only did they not overachieve last year, they completely underachieved! They were stacked last year and were definitely the fastest public team in the state and one of the fastest period. Milford Mill overachieved, not Franklin!
    Totally agree!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Owings Mills Maryland
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BmoreCounty99 View Post
    Totally agree!
    Franklin was the youngest team in the area last season

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BJC View Post
    Franklin was the youngest team in the area last season
    Youngest team in the area? No they weren't. They had young parts in the twins and Smothers(Hinton didn't even play until end of the year) but the rest of their team were upperclassmen.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GREYHOUND ALUM View Post
    Youngest team in the area? No they weren't. They had young parts in the twins and Smothers(Hinton didn't even play until end of the year) but the rest of their team were upperclassmen.
    Correct again!

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Owings Mills Maryland
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GREYHOUND ALUM View Post
    Youngest team in the area? No they weren't. They had young parts in the twins and Smothers(Hinton didn't even play until end of the year) but the rest of their team were upperclassmen.
    21 fresh/soph
    14 juniors

    35 returning players from last years roster

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BJC View Post
    21 fresh/soph
    14 juniors

    35 returning players from last years roster
    Rob A can speak on this better than me but that seems like a little off numbers wise. 35 returners for any team is a boat load! I don't know Franklin's roster well enough to actually dispute you but I know about the starters and no way will they be returning a whole load of starters!

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    http://www.maxpreps.com/high-schools...all/roster.htm

    If this is last year's Franklin roster, BJC seems to be correct.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by First_Down View Post
    http://www.maxpreps.com/high-schools...all/roster.htm

    If this is last year's Franklin roster, BJC seems to be correct.

    That seems to be the roster but what I'm talking about is starters returning. 35 players is definitely a lot of players returning but looking at that roster, looks like they might have 8 returning starters(depending on who stays there and they played a lot of two way starters) and I'm counting Hinton who didn't even play until the end of the year(and I don't think he started when he played). So they don't return much as far as who actually played last year. They still have some serious speed and skill players there and that's no denying but they lose too much in very key places.
    Last edited by GREYHOUND ALUM; 02-10-2013 at 05:27 AM.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    If a team is defined as all the members and not just the seniors or the starters, then BJC is correct to me backed by the hard facts rather than just an opinion shot from the hip. 51 players is a good solid number of player nowadays for public schools, especially if Franklin isn't one of the traditional programs that breed players numbers wise year in and year out.
    Last edited by First_Down; 02-10-2013 at 09:42 AM. Reason: Corrected Bad Comment

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by First_Down View Post
    If a team is defined as all the members and not just the seniors or the starters, then BJC is correct to me backed by the hard facts rather than just an opinion shot from the hip. 51 players is a good solid number of player nowadays for public schools, especially if Franklin isn't one of the traditional programs that breed players numbers wise year in and year out. The only issue that comes to mind for me only based on shooting from the hip opinions around here is that talk of fifth year or reclassifyed players. It's not me saying these things but only what othrs here have publicaly posted complete with names.
    Are you saying that Franklin has 5th year seniors on their team?

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    My bad ---my bad..... Let me take this all back. I momentarily was thinking of St Frances as opposed to Franklin..... My bad! I take back what I said and will correct my comment.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by First_Down View Post
    http://www.maxpreps.com/high-schools...all/roster.htm

    If this is last year's Franklin roster, BJC seems to be correct.

    This list is an expanded list after they moved up about 10 jv players for the playoffs,and like GA said 70 to 85% played both ways,Smothers and another fresh were on varsity and out of the two Smothers had an impact,three sophs made major contributions,maybe 3 jrs and the real major players were Srs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278