Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 62

Thread: Woman Killed While Protected by Protective Order

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ybnormal View Post
    Like criminals need arming?
    You just want to make it easier and legal, is that it?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,416

    Default

    Okay, sorry I didn't think so by that picture.

    Quote Originally Posted by dialtone View Post
    "Katie Hadel, a 1998 graduate of Franklin High School who married Craig Gordon four years ago, was a stay-at-home mother to their 3-year-old daughter, Ava Gordon, ..."

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Savage act, animal filth.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spot72 View Post
    Savage act, animal filth.
    Yep. That about sums it up.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    19,183

    Default

    I just can't believe that he did that when there was a protective order in place. Perhaps we need a new law stating that you have to obey the law,that will protect us about as much as new gun laws.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I just can't believe that he did that when there was a protective order in place. Perhaps we need a new law stating that you have to obey the law,that will protect us about as much as new gun laws.
    And let's make it illegal to be mean to people.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    I just can't believe that he did that when there was a protective order in place. Perhaps we need a new law stating that you have to obey the law,that will protect us about as much as new gun laws.
    So you want to arm convicted criminals too?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    So you want to arm convicted criminals too?
    Depends on the crime. Obviously any violent crime convictions should eliminate consideration for Concealed Carry permits or handgun licenses. And anything that is indicative of significant mental health or addictions. But not all crimes should preclude gun ownership.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,579

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    Depends on the crime. Obviously any violent crime convictions should eliminate consideration for Concealed Carry permits or handgun licenses. And anything that is indicative of significant mental health or addictions. But not all crimes should preclude gun ownership.
    What about a robbery conviction and other charges?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    Depends on the crime. Obviously any violent crime convictions should eliminate consideration for Concealed Carry permits or handgun licenses. And anything that is indicative of significant mental health or addictions. But not all crimes should preclude gun ownership.
    Ummm??????

    Quote Originally Posted by Haberdasher View Post
    Her robbery conviction disqualified her from possessing a firearm.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    What about a robbery conviction and other charges?
    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    Ummm??????
    A person convicted of a non-violent crime should lose the right to defend his life?

    What interest does the government have in denying the RKBA simply because somebody is convicted of a crime?

    Can they also lose the right to free speech?

    To go to church?

    To have a jury trial?

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    A person convicted of a non-violent crime should lose the right to defend his life?
    So let me get this straight. You want a convicted robber to own a gun? Do I have that right?

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    So let me get this straight. You want a convicted robber to own a gun?
    What if he's a convicted embezzler? Are you more comfortable with white collar felonies?

    How does a person lose the right to defend his life?

    Commit one crime and become a lifelong target?


    Do I have that right?
    NO --- everybody but you.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    What about a robbery conviction and other charges?
    I was speaking in general terms. If I was making the rules I would include robbery as a disqualifying crime. Shoplifting: no. Speeding: No. Open container: No. DWI: Yes, Armed Robbery: Yes, Assault: Yes, Bank Fraud: No Possession of pot: No, Drug Dealing: Yes

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ybnormal View Post
    So where's the "blame the cops" crowd, still sleeping I'd wager. If the punk was violent, wouldn't you go into hiding instead of thinking a piece of paper was going to protect you? It never ends.
    Go back to sleep.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    19,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    So you want to arm convicted criminals too?
    Where have you been,there has always been a law for that.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian View Post
    Where have you been,there has always been a law for that.
    There's a law to legally arm criminals?

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    What if he's a convicted embezzler? Are you more comfortable with white collar felonies?
    This thread isn't about an embezzler

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,858

    Default

    I'm not sure why the brutal death of this young woman turned into a gun debate. However, how about this? Maybe she didn't want to own a gun? Youn know, some people are not comfortable handling one much less the thought of pulling the trigger.

    I've been saying for years on this forum that "protection order" are not worth the paper they are printed on and victims shouldn't believe otherwise.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,176

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    I'm not sure why the brutal death of this young woman turned into a gun debate.
    It started here

    Quote Originally Posted by TheResearcher View Post
    If she had had a gun, she might still be alive.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278