Should black people tolerate this?

[bullmikey]

Poverty, crime, and broken homes are all connected and at the root of the problem for people in the inner-city(and the suburbs to a certain degree).

Granted.

It's not going to go away if we ignore it.

My point as well.

[sigmalady]

Black folks should be relieved that gurgle and the gang at AT have your back.

With friends like them we certainly don't need enemies I notice that none of the the articles put forth any solutions, just point fingers.

[musicmd]

And RalR only posts crimes involving whites.

I have yet to see you post one critical comment regarding his posts.

Not one.

Hypocrite racist.

Try reading it may help. Trying reporting on crimes in chinatown

[bmorepunk]

Again, as pointed out - I'm not complaining about my threads or his threads, only about the hypocrites who complain about my threads and ignore his.

If you had some history on this, my inner city crime threads started for one reason - to counter another poster who thought it wise to post each and every crime that involved a white non-inner city person. I chose to fight fire with fire, and many (hypocrites) here got upset, while simultaneously not saying one word about the "other" posts.

At one point, even a few Personal Messages were sent to me by a mod and the other poster, and we (I thought) had an agreement to stop.

However, not more than 6 days passed before he began again, hence my continued attention to the matter.

And if you think it's petty, or childish for me to do so - who cares what you think. As long as "the other side" is going to push an agenda, I will counter it, and as long a I don't violate any TOS here, I will continue until he ceases.

Get over it, stop whining, and perhaps call out "the other side" once if you are so keen on seeing it disappear.

Okay, I see now. If someone posts threads with a consistent theme then goes onto the polar opposite's version and gives them trouble about their version, that's fine. A person who simply posts responses on the polar opposite thread but doesn't do it on what they agree with is being hypocritical.

There is a super liberal poster who historically has done the same sort of thing you do. If it wasn't so opposite in ideology I would wonder if you were the same person. I've provided them with far more negative feedback than you will probably ever receive.

I don't know if childish or petty are accurate terms to describe what is going on here. While your posting style is uninspired and predictable, your tendency to be straightforward most of the time while sporadically straying into incoherence is pretty fascinating. I'm also interested in how much change you think you're effecting with your information warfare campaign against your buddy (not to mention some other key issues you're always working), and what really drives you to do so.

[Jeebus]

Okay, I see now. If someone posts threads with a consistent theme then goes onto the polar opposite's version and gives them trouble about their version, that's fine. A person who simply posts responses on the polar opposite thread but doesn't do it on what they agree with is being hypocritical.

There is a super liberal poster who historically has done the same sort of thing you do. If it wasn't so opposite in ideology I would wonder if you were the same person. I've provided them with far more negative feedback than you will probably ever receive.

I don't know if childish or petty are accurate terms to describe what is going on here. While your posting style is uninspired and predictable, your tendency to be straightforward most of the time while sporadically straying into incoherence is pretty fascinating. I'm also interested in how much change you think you're effecting with your information warfare campaign against your buddy (not to mention some other key issues you're always working), and what really drives you to do so.

Read this part again:

...who cares what you think. As long as "the other side" is going to push an agenda, I will counter it, and as long a I don't violate any TOS here, I will continue until he ceases.

Get over it, stop whining, and perhaps call out "the other side" once if you are so keen on seeing it disappear.

[musicmd]

Where did the poster say he was lynched? Interesting how you avoid seeing the double standard.

You got the audacity to make such a statement , If If IF BTTT. Your ststement is unreal, really.

[musicmd]

Okay, I see now. If someone posts threads with a consistent theme then goes onto the polar opposite's version and gives them trouble about their version, that's fine. A person who simply posts responses on the polar opposite thread but doesn't do it on what they agree with is being hypocritical.

There is a super liberal poster who historically has done the same sort of thing you do. If it wasn't so opposite in ideology I would wonder if you were the same person. I've provided them with far more negative feedback than you will probably ever receive.

I don't know if childish or petty are accurate terms to describe what is going on here. While your posting style is uninspired and predictable, your tendency to be straightforward most of the time while sporadically straying into incoherence is pretty fascinating. I'm also interested in how much change you think you're effecting with your information warfare campaign against your buddy (not to mention some other key issues you're always working), and what really drives you to do so.

Why do you even waste your time ?

[The Shadow]

I'm offended that in Black History Month you are trying to rationalize a form of terrorism against Blacks:

First of all, I don't recognize a month set aside to celebrate accomplishments based on a persons 'race' and 'skin color'. That's 'racist'.

However, since you do, who the heck are you, other than a hypocrite, to tell me about 'offending' anybody, when you attempted to glorify a black Psychopathic Spree Killer who murdered 4 people, three in cold blood, including an innocent young woman and her "black" fiance, as a "Black Rambo" super-hero during your 'Black History Month'?

[musicmd]

First of all, I don't recognize a month set aside to celebrate accomplishments based on a persons 'race' and 'skin color'. That's 'racist'.

However, since you do, who the heck are you, other than a hypocrite, to tell me about 'offending' anybody, when you attempted to glorify a black Psychopathic Spree Killer who murdered 4 people, three in cold blood, including an innocent young woman and her "black" fiance, as a "Black Rambo" super-hero during your 'Black History Month'?

Your posting the above makes you a liar.

[bmorepunk]

Read this part again:

I forgot about this train wreck. Thanks for the bump, Shadow.

Did you win the war today Jeebus? Did you put on your internet sunglasses again? I usually see the rolling eyes one, so I appreciate the effort to pick a different one for your post. Roughly how many years does it take to get as awesome as you?

[bmorepunk]

Is Shadow talking about that Sam Jackson Film Time to Kill?

By the way, Shadow, I had to reverse search your avatar because I had no idea what it was. It looked like some weird dude playing a harmonica or yelling through his hand. Supposedly it's either an actual photo of our President when he was younger smoking weed or it's a simulation. Either way, that avatar is miserable failure because unless you've already seen it you can't figure out what it is.