Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Revealing the Real TANF

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,904

    Default Revealing the Real TANF

    ... the American people have been sold a bill of goods when it comes to the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program created in 1996...

    continues;


    Both parties tout it as a “success,” but if you look at the numbers—and at the real lives of people who turn to the program for assistance when they are out of work—the picture is bleak, to say the least.

    This March, TANF is set to expire and will need to be renewed. It will mark yet another opportunity to have an honest, fact-based discussion about the program. So it was good to see a top-notch panel of experts at the Center for American Progress (CAP) yesterday talking about TANF—“Learning from the Past, Planning for the Future.”

    ...

    ... top line statistic in assessing TANF as a safety net—a statistic that I wish every member of Congress and every progressive activist had on his or her bulletin board, and that the mainstream press would deign to report every now and then—is this: Before welfare reform, for every 100 families with children in poverty in the US, 68 were able to access cash assistance; now that number has fallen to just 27 (and Pavetti thinks it will be even lower when the 2012 data comes in). The benefit for those lucky twenty-seven families who are able to access it is less than 30 percent of the poverty line in most states—so less than $5,400 annually for a family of three.

    ...


    Hardly high livin'...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,860

    Default

    “It’s a real struggle,” she said. “It’s what the women in Witnesses to Hunger call ‘the monster under the bed.’ Because they know they need to improve their education in order to make a better wage. But as [one] Witness said, ‘What am I supposed to do? Tell my kids I can’t feed you for two years—just wait while I go to school and then I’ll feed you?’ So there’s a real Catch-22 between advancing education to get the better job, or going into work and getting stuck in this dead-end job. We need to find some better ways to work with this system.”
    How about waiting until you get your education/training before you have children?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,502

    Default

    Makes too much sense

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sigmalady View Post
    How about waiting until you get your education/training before you have children?
    How about that. But of course asking a question like this gets you labeled as not caring about the children.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRaven View Post
    How about that. But of course asking a question like this gets you labeled as not caring about the children.
    I don't think public assistance should provide easy, comfortable living. The problem in the myth that most people receiving assistance are living well.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sigmalady View Post
    I don't think public assistance should provide easy, comfortable living. The problem in the myth that most people receiving assistance are living well.
    No it shouldn't be easy. It should provide the assistance needed for one to become self sufficient, but it should be difficult as well to provide the incentive to get off it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,502

    Default

    I think the point of the thread is to show that those getting assistance aren't living like the Rockefellers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,860

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I think the point of the thread is to show that those getting assistance aren't living like the Rockefellers
    I agree with that point. But I think the wrong way to make it is to give the impression that we should make things easier for people who make bad decisions.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,502

    Default

    I'm not sure that was the point of the OP. I can't speak for him, but I think his post is aimed at people who post here and claim those on assistance are driving fancy cars and have "60 televisions in their public housing units

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    I'm not sure that was the point of the OP. I can't speak for him, but I think his post is aimed at people who post here and claim those on assistance are driving fancy cars and have "60 televisions in their public housing units
    As with anything, there are always abuses. They are not the norm.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278