Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 36 of 36

Thread: Texas Teen Sues Parents to Avoid Forced Abortion

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9,751

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrsmlh View Post
    I hope she gets to keep her baby but I wonder how many posters here are going to condemn her for going on welfare to support herself and her baby when her parents refuse to support them.
    She's a minor . Her parents are responsible, and DSS will go after them for payment.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sigmalady View Post
    She's a minor . Her parents are responsible, and DSS will go after them for payment.
    Not so.

    Grandparents have no legal responsibility to support their grandchildren.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    Texas teen wins right to have baby after suing parents

    February 19, 2013

    A pregnant Texas teen has won the right to have her baby after she reached an agreement with her parents, who she had sued claiming they were forcing her to abort the fetus.

    MyFoxHouston.com reports the 16-year-old teen, who was only identified in court records as R.E.K., will be allowed to have the child and her parents will not threaten her with physical force.

    Under the terms of the agreement, the parents will allow the girl to marry her 16-year-old boyfriend Evan Madison, who told MyFoxHouston.com he is glad the legal matter has been settled.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Not so.

    Grandparents have no legal responsibility to support their grandchildren.
    But they have an obligation to support their children to age 18. That might not apply, however, if she gets married and becomes an "emancipated minor".

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    50,296

    Default

    So, they won't name the girl but they name her fiancé, the father of her child?
    Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
    Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    But they have an obligation to support their children to age 18.
    That might not apply, however, if she gets married and becomes an "emancipated minor".
    That's what the teen in this case is doing --- getting married.

    Grandparents don't have to let their grandkids live in their house.

    So if these teens want to keep these babies and the parents REALLY object, they'd have to emancipate themselves, in some way.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Two 16-year-olds getting married and raising an infant doesn't sound at all promising. Hasn't this girl ever heard of adoption?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    Two 16-year-olds getting married and raising an infant doesn't sound at all promising. Hasn't this girl ever heard of adoption?
    The 14 year old this group represented was considering adoption:

    The young girl also alleges that her cousins and grandmother scheduled an appointment at the Coastal Birth Control Center to terminate the pregnancy against her will. The girl's grandmother, Carmen Pantoja, denies the allegations against her family. Pantoja says she suggested an abortion, but never tried to force her to have one. . .

    Now at 10 weeks pregnant, she is living with the family of the father of her unborn child.

    Both of the parents of the baby agree the pregnancy should be brought to term. Adoption is still a possible consideration. . .

    http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art174764.asp

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    Two 16-year-olds getting married and raising an infant doesn't sound at all promising. Hasn't this girl ever heard of adoption?
    I would suspect adoption has been suggested. But how do you force a parent to give up their child?
    My children are my legacy.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,326

    Default

    Glad the court made the correct decision. Horrible parents.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    So you agree a minor should make the decision to have or not have an abortion?
    So you agree that if the "minor" is able to make the "choice" then she should be responsible for her decision ?

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    I would suspect adoption has been suggested. But how do you force a parent to give up their child?
    Have a credible third-party explain to the girl what it entails to raise an infant when the mother and father are both 16 years old.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grindelwald View Post
    Glad the court made the correct decision.
    They couldn't have (legally) ruled any other way. The constitutional standard on this issue is clear - it's the choice of the pregnant woman or girl in the first trimester.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by regularguy View Post
    Have a credible party explain to the girl what it entails to raise an infant when the mother and father are both 16 years old.

    What do you think should have happened with this lawsuit?
    My children are my legacy.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    24,817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    What do you think should have happened with this lawsuit?
    It's the girl's choice. If she wants to keep the child, that's her constitutional right.

    I'm undoubtedly biased, since both my now-grown kids were adopted, but it seems crazy for two 16-year-olds to raise an infant in our modern society. (The birth parents of one of my kids were both 15 when she gave birth.)

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    the NC sandhills
    Posts
    26,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    What do you think should have happened with this lawsuit?
    i know this question wasn't directed at me, but...

    If you're old enough to Breed, and old enough to Decide, then the parents shouldn't be forced to pay for your stupid mistake.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278