Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 181 to 185 of 185

Thread: Police looking to identify multiple women seen in Hopkins gynecologist pics, videos

  1. #181
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    No one has been held accountable. Yet.

    Yes, that's right, most women hope that our OBN?GYN invades our privacy. Some of us wait a lifetime for that to happen. It wouldn't surprise me if a couple of the women gifted him with recording devices. Oh yeah, and they wanted him to photo children as well. Yep. Busted.
    Perfectly stated.

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Perfectly stated.
    Evidently you also misinterpreted what I said to elicit that response. It's preposterous to think that the majority of people would publicize such an intimate part of their lives for cash. But, as I said to Sprightly, maybe you haven't run into anyone willing to do anything for a fast buck either.

  3. #183
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,698

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D.Sebring View Post
    To me, when an individual oversteps the boundaries set by their terms of employment, without the employer's knowledge, it's the individual at fault. .
    To you, yes. (wrongly).

    To the law, no.

    Your employer is liable for the actions you take while you are acting in the interests of your employer. If he was seeing patients at JH, for JH, and getting paid by JH--they are liable.

    The legal term is "respondeat superior" which is Latin for "let the superior answer."

  4. #184
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,757

    Default

    What did Hopkins do to monitor and ensure that their facilities and employees followed their own established or recommended procedures and guidelines that a third person be present to mitigate the possibility of such doctor~patient privacy violations? Otherwise ~ why recommend such guidelines in the first place? I would be very surprised if that was not their policy.

    Policies and procedures need to be systematically reviewed on a regular basis to ensure compliance. I can easily see where failure to do so might be construed as negligence that contributed to allowing of such egregious transgressions to have occurred unnoticed for an ongoing, long period of time.

    But that is just my subjective opinion. How it will play out in the courts is another thing altogether.

  5. #185
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    To you, yes. (wrongly).
    Y'all sure know how to punctuate a sentence 'round these parts...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278