Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 185

Thread: Police looking to identify multiple women seen in Hopkins gynecologist pics, videos

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    If you want to be spoken of kindly in your death, don't leave such a horrible legacy behind. It really is that simple.
    Look, I don't care about his horrible legacy; I do not say callous things about the dead. Now, there are jerks in hear telling me if the doctor was white, I would feel different. Being that his name is Levy, I thought he was white. Then again if he was white, jeebus would have not started the thread. I do not carry around negative emotions; I follow the teaching of my father. (Who is white?) Maybe that’s how you feel, and it is not my concern. Have a nice day.

    Why are you telling about spoken of kindly in your death.

    I was taught that if you don't have anything good to say about the dead, don't say anything at all in Sunday school.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    I don't have a hateful view of the dead in general. Just the POS percent scumbag pervert in question.
    Killing yourself does not make you somehow beyond reproach.
    So that is your business, I have my feelings, and you have yours. Just don't try to tell me how, and why I feel a certain way.
    Last edited by musicmd; 02-24-2013 at 02:14 PM.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    Perfect hypocrisy. Well done.
    You are the Perfect picture of hypocrisy.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,229

    Default

    musicmd would you tell others not to speak ill of Adolph Hitler?
    My children are my legacy.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by musicmd View Post
    Look, I don't care about his horrible legacy; I do not say callous things about the dead. Now, there are jerks in hear telling me if the doctor was white, I would feel different. Being that his name is Levy, I thought he was white. Then again if he was white, jeebus would have not started the thread. I do not carry around negative emotions; I follow the teaching of my father. (Who is white?) Maybe that’s how you feel, and it is not my concern. Have a nice day.

    Why are you telling about spoken of kindly in your death.

    I was taught that if you don't have anything good to say about the dead, don't say anything at all in Sunday school.
    I am certain that I don't care what your or your father's race is.

    I was taught that about the living. The dead just do not care, musicmd. Really. They don't.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by musicmd View Post
    You are the Perfect picture of hypocrisy.
    Exactly how so?

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demopublican View Post
    Exactly how so?
    Look in a mirror

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Baltimore county
    Posts
    3,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    I am certain that I don't care what your or your father's race is.

    I was taught that about the living. The dead just do not care, musicmd. Really. They don't.
    I was taught not to talk bad about the dead from the teaching of MLK, and my parents. I never said you should care about my father's race since he is dead. I brought my father's race up based on what demopublican, demopublican , and smokey said. They jumped on your band wagon in full force, telling me what I feel.

    Based on your teaching the dead is dead. I respect the dead.
    Last edited by musicmd; 02-24-2013 at 03:31 AM.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saticon3 View Post
    This is all about lawyers and money now, nothing else. The guy is dead. Unless there is some indication that someone else acted in concert with him criminally, the police should close the investigation. Its the police job to prepare cases for criminal prosecution, not civil litiagtion. If there is no one left alive to charge criminally, what point is further police invlovment?????

    I heard a news person say a suit has been filed for purposes of " justice and gathering information" BS, its for getting money and since the guy is dead and his estate probably not worth zillions, they will sue and collect against Hopkins, who it seems to me would not have much of a way of knowing what he was doing, so the lawsuits and awards will only hurt Hopkins patients in the long run through higher rates.
    I suspect that we will find out that he was distributing these pictures in same way and there are others involved.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by musicmd View Post
    Look in a mirror
    Do you need me to define the word for you?

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Baltimore, MD, USA
    Posts
    50,296

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saticon3 View Post
    This is all about lawyers and money now, nothing else. The guy is dead. Unless there is some indication that someone else acted in concert with him criminally, the police should close the investigation. Its the police job to prepare cases for criminal prosecution, not civil litiagtion. If there is no one left alive to charge criminally, what point is further police invlovment?????

    I heard a news person say a suit has been filed for purposes of " justice and gathering information" BS, its for getting money and since the guy is dead and his estate probably not worth zillions, they will sue and collect against Hopkins, who it seems to me would not have much of a way of knowing what he was doing, so the lawsuits and awards will only hurt Hopkins patients in the long run through higher rates.
    That raises the whole question of what, if any, damages there are to to patients whose pictures he took. Yes, it was without consent, but if the pictures were kept private, or even if they were circulated without the identity of the patient being revealed, is there anything for which a person could collect?

    The Schochor firm made a major settlement against a Delaware hospital and others in the case of Dr. Earl Bradley, a pediatrician convicted of molesting over 100 children. Clearly there were victims here.

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/mar...,2538811.story
    Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein; dieser Weg wird steinig und schwer.
    Nicht mit vielen wirst du dir einig sein, doch dieses Leben bietet so viel mehr. --Xavier Naidoo

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baltimatt View Post
    That raises the whole question of what, if any, damages there are to to patients whose pictures he took. Yes, it was without consent, but if the pictures were kept private, or even if they were circulated without the identity of the patient being revealed, is there anything for which a person could collect?

    The Schochor firm made a major settlement against a Delaware hospital and others in the case of Dr. Earl Bradley, a pediatrician convicted of molesting over 100 children. Clearly there were victims here.

    http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/mar...,2538811.story
    Really, Matt?

    Their privacy was grossly violated by the breach in doctor~patient confidentiality. Could a person collect if someone took pictures of women in the ladies room or dressing rooms without their knowledge as long as the pervert kept the pictures private or did not show enough to reveal their identities? For that matter ~ were any of the doctor's victims minors?

    Of course they could collect. And should.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Really, Matt?

    Their privacy was grossly violated by the breach in doctor~patient confidentiality. Could a person collect if someone took pictures of women in the ladies room or dressing rooms without their knowledge as long as the pervert kept the pictures private or did not show enough to reveal their identities? For that matter ~ were any of the doctor's victims minors?

    Of course they could collect. And should.
    It's crazy, right? I truly do not understand how Matt, Saticon and others do not get this.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Garyland
    Posts
    17,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by musicmd View Post
    I was taught not to talk bad about the dead from the teaching of MLK, and my parents. I never said you should care about my father's race since he is dead. I brought my father's race up based on what demopublican, demopublican , and smokey said. They jumped on your band wagon in full force, telling me what I feel.

    Based on your teaching the dead is dead. I respect the dead.
    Sorry. I can't buy into that philosophy. Death simply does not buy some people forgiveness for their evil and/or selfish deeds.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default Police

    Quote Originally Posted by octoburn View Post
    Really, Matt?

    Their privacy was grossly violated by the breach in doctor~patient confidentiality. Could a person collect if someone took pictures of women in the ladies room or dressing rooms without their knowledge as long as the pervert kept the pictures private or did not show enough to reveal their identities? For that matter ~ were any of the doctor's victims minors?

    Of course they could collect. And should.
    This is just another attempted money grab against Hopkins' deep pockets because the bum responsible for the wrongs done is dead and judgment proof. The lawyers better have evidence that someone at Hopkins knew what was going on and ignored it or else these lawsuits wont make it to Court.

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,335

    Default polfice

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    It's crazy, right? I truly do not understand how Matt, Saticon and others do not get this.
    Question for you: unless these women can look at a picture and positively ID it as HER vagina how are they going to prove that it is them in the picture? Before you start saying im a sexist this was a question my wife brought up.

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,369

    Default

    The "Johnny Cochran" slickee-boy lawyer I saw on the news last night said that even if your WEREN'T one of the women who was photographed, you still have a case to sue them.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    Question for you: unless these women can look at a picture and positively ID it as HER vagina how are they going to prove that it is them in the picture? Before you start saying im a sexist this was a question my wife brought up.
    It really wouldn't matter. Most people would feel a tad distressed ~ to put it mildly ~ knowing that your privacy had been violated by her doctor and that a pervert has used such pictures for whatever gratification purposes, personal or private. And especially if it involved their minor child daughter.

    Is it reasonable to assume that it might create concern and stress at such use and being violated in such a way?

  19. #79
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,904

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omaha Beach View Post
    Question for you: unless these women can look at a picture and positively ID it as HER vagina how are they going to prove that it is them in the picture? Before you start saying im a sexist this was a question my wife brought up.
    We don't even know if the photos are "only" vagina shots. How would your wife feel if she were the victim of a camera hidden in a toilet and that photo was shared on the internet? Would she be angry? Would she want the perpertrator to pay for violating an implied privacy issue?

  20. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    15,602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    We don't even know if the photos are "only" vagina shots. How would your wife feel if she were the victim of a camera hidden in a toilet and that photo was shared on the internet? Would she be angry? Would she want the perpertrator to pay for violating an implied privacy issue?
    It's the same as having a child abducted, but returned safely afer a short while with no physical harm, and asking what damages were really done.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278