Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 121 to 138 of 138

Thread: Another example of Democrat/MSNBC Hypocrisy

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    He's got you there banner. When you defend President Bush, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, etc with the same "moral outrage" then we'll listen. Until then it's just the usual selective liberal outrage.
    Quote Originally Posted by soulflower View Post
    Jeebs is just a nasty person day after day. He either needs a hug or a girlfriend
    Add soully to your list as well, no different in their selective outrage.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    40,381

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeebus View Post
    Add soully to your list as well, no different in their selective outrage.
    I don't see any posters attacking those people day after day the way you attack the POTUS. You have no equal. Atleast Sushi/Gene's posts are funny.

    Your attacks are nasty and personal. Way beyond political disagreement.

    As much as I disagreed with Bush, I never had anything against him personally. He seems like an overall nice person.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    It's embarrassing to be a freaking American NOW!
    Good grief.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    1 Winning Drive
    Posts
    4,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Creekman View Post
    Your comments reveal you to be a goose stepping right winger.

    Independent...lol.
    I call them as I see them. You and Finn and some of the others are so lock-step with your politics that you've lost your senses. Anybody who disagrees with you is right wing.

    I'm neither but you keep spinning!

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Here's yet another example of why I find Liberals complaining about Republican filibusters to be comical (and hypocritical) to say the least.

    Obama called President Bush "failed leadership" in regards to raising the debt ceiling. Here's his whole statement:

    “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. … Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here. Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better”.

    Yet, Obama finds raising the debt ceiling OK when he is President. Would he not be failed leadership also according to his own words? Obama is a liar and a charlaton. He's a great politician, but a horrible leader. He talks out of both sides of his mouth, but now Liberals want to comlplain when Repulbicans do some political maneuvering of their own. Sorry, but in politics you live and die by the proverbial sword. Obama is reaping what he has sown.

    Oh, is it true that this statement has disappeared from Senate records?

    http://www.redstate.com/alanjoelny/2013/01/14/220/
    So Eric Ericson is your leader. Another RWNJ!

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    21,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    It's not my fault you can't read and comprehend.
    What was there to read and comprehend?

    What does Obama's political statement against President Bush have to do with the Republican abuse of the filibuster?

    Answer: Nothing.

    Now that you and Jeebus have been proved dead wrong on your claims that the Democrats used the filibuster just as the Republicans have done, your reduced to grasping at straws in irrelevancies.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phineas Finn View Post
    What does Obama's political statement against President Bush have to do with the Republican abuse of the filibuster?
    Gee I don't know Finn, could have something to with the topic of the overall thread being Democratic/MSNBC Hypocrisy.

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Orlando, FL (born and raised in Baltimore)
    Posts
    10,547

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    He's got you there banner. When you defend President Bush, Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, etc with the same "moral outrage" then we'll listen. Until then it's just the usual selective liberal outrage.
    Actually he's got nothing. Neither of you have been around here long enough to know what the H-E-Double Hockey Sticks you're talking about. Anyone who's been here as long as I have can attest to the many knock-down drag outs I got into with some pretty far left posters in the past defending President Bush so you can take that selective outrage crap and shove it.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,773

    Default

    What we can all agree on is The Cycle is a pathetic attempt to rip off The Five.

    I guess tey have to put something on that channel other than prison shows and marijuana inc.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Brooklyn!
    Posts
    14,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Which has zero to do with sequestration, but:


    The bolded is political speak for "unless we raise taxes."

    Happy to help.
    The Bush administration's fiscal policies are the reason we are in this mess. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

  11. #131
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy in Mudville
    The Bush administration's fiscal policies are the reason we are in this mess. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?
    I don't think you need to convince Cameron.

  12. #132
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy in Mudville View Post
    The Bush administration's fiscal policies are the reason we are in this mess. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?
    Uh, because Obama has been in office for 4 years and any rational, objective, bipartisan person understands he owns it now.

  13. #133
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang
    Uh, because Obama has been in office for 4 years and any rational, objective, bipartisan person understands he owns it now.
    Sorry but the economy is a much longer term process than that, as any rational, objective, bipartisan person understands.

  14. #134
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Brooklyn!
    Posts
    14,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    Uh, because Obama has been in office for 4 years and any rational, objective, bipartisan person understands he owns it now.
    Obama inherited record deficits and an economy in freefall. The economy is recovering and the deficit has begun to go down.

    Bush inherited budget surpluses, a country at peace, and a booming economy. How did that work out?

  15. #135
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy in Mudville View Post
    Obama inherited record deficits and an economy in freefall. The economy is recovering and the deficit has begun to go down.

    Bush inherited budget surpluses, a country at peace, and a booming economy. How did that work out?
    Bush also inherited 9/11 thanks to Clinton who cut the budget of the FBI, CIA, Coast Guard, etc. when he first came into office in 1993. He thought the new technology could replace actual agents inside terrorists organizations. After 9/11, and the loss of so many experienced M.E. agents, it took time to get the spy agencies back up to speed, and cost more money in the long run.

  16. #136
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Rehoboth, DE
    Posts
    7,242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Bush also inherited 9/11 thanks to Clinton who cut the budget of the FBI, CIA, Coast Guard, etc. when he first came into office in 1993. He thought the new technology could replace actual agents inside terrorists organizations. After 9/11, and the loss of so many experienced M.E. agents, it took time to get the spy agencies back up to speed, and cost more money in the long run.
    Seems to me the information was flowing.

    President Bush was told more than a month before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, that supporters of Osama bin Laden planned an attack within the United States with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes, a government official said Friday.

    The warning came in a secret briefing that Mr. Bush received at his ranch in Crawford, Tex., on Aug. 6, 2001. A report by a joint Congressional committee last year alluded to a ''closely held intelligence report'' that month about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda, and the official confirmed an account by The Associated Press on Friday saying that the report was in fact part of the president's briefing in Crawford.

    The disclosure appears to contradict the White House's repeated assertions that the briefing the president received about the Qaeda threat was ''historical'' in nature and that the White House had little reason to suspect a Qaeda attack within American borders.


    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/10/us...ted=all&src=pm

  17. #137
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    4,210

    Default

    "Blame Bush" is still alive and well even in Obama's 2nd term. LMAO! Stunning actually, the lack of accountabilty. But they did win in November so I guess they have the right to blame whoever they want for Obama's shortcomings.

  18. #138
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    1 Winning Drive
    Posts
    4,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fang View Post
    "Blame Bush" is still alive and well even in Obama's 2nd term. LMAO! Stunning actually, the lack of accountabilty. But they did win in November so I guess they have the right to blame whoever they want for Obama's shortcomings.
    After four years...well it's your economy! He owns it much like Bush did in his term.

    He could have done things to fix it, he didn't. He's willing to live with it while spinning it now as the repubs (as a Bush substitute) fault!

    He's good at finding fault in others!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278