Who has to make up anything? There's nothing secret about the nonsense liberals have pushed in schools for decades. If you weren't concerned about emotional upset, why did you make your "bullying" comment? Bullying is pretty easily identified but you guys go way beyond that. First we had hate speech. What's next? Hate by indifference? Too funny and, as I said, pathetic.
You cannot force students to be friends with one another.
My children are my legacy.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I was not sure. But certainly it is the job of educators or whoever works with children to teach tolerance.
At the same time I must admit I had the best parents. There were ahead of their time.
My children are my legacy.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I could not possibly make this any clearer. Taking steps to ostracize another student because you think they are weird and you want to make their life miserable is bullying. Did you do that to me? Of course not. If you had actually read what I have been writing, you'd know I'm not saying that merely ignoring someone is bullying.
No, I like hypotheticals. They make things a lot clearer. Apparently you need things spelled out for you.
So what would you do if you thought some kids were ignoring a student to be mean? Would you punish them? Would you force them to associate with the student? How would you address it?
I'd imagine that as an educator you'd know what I am talking about. To give a specific example, I have a girl who is a rather weird 5th grader. Other girls in the class refuse to include her in any activities, but plainly talk about their plans in front of her to make her feel badly that she was not included. There is plenty of cruel talking behind her back that goes on too, but all of her teachers know quite clearly when the other girls are torturing her by playing the ignoring game, as I she can say something and nobody hears her.
Hypotheticals don't make things clearer, they allow you to fantasize about absurd situations. When children are bullying I try to find out why, because it is often that they have insecurity issues that need addressing of their own. If a child is being cruel and they have been warned yet choose to continue, I will keep them for detention and call their parents in for a conference. You can't force kids to socialize, but you can make it clear that deliberate bullying will have consequences.
You think ostracizing the other kid is bullying yet you recognize that you can't force kids to socialize. Suppose the kid keeps ignoring the other kid? What consequences? Put him back in detention until what? Until he socializes with the other kid?
You don't know much about freedom do you? You sure don't respect it.
Do you know what ostracizing means? Yes, ostracizing other kids because they are different is bullying, and it should carry a consequence. I've already said you can't make kids socialize with other kids, so the fact that you continue bringing it up shows that you're either not reading or you're unable.
I know plenty about freedom. You don't know much about how schools run, and your examples are positively stupid. Kids DO NOT have the "freedom" to purposely make other kids feel like crap.
Yes I do. Maybe you don't. It is just more than one person ignoring someone.
World English Dictionary
ostracize or ostracise (ˈɒstrəˌsaɪz)
— vb
1. to exclude or banish (a person) from a particular group, society, etc
2. (in ancient Greece) to punish by temporary exile
No, I don't understand your circular logic here. If ostracizing other kids is bullying and is a violation that carries a consequence, and you acknowledge that you can't force kids to socialize, how will the parties in violation not be in violation without them being "forced" to socialize with the other kids? Will they be in virtual violation all year?Yes, ostracizing other kids because they are different is bullying, and it should carry a consequence. I've already said you can't make kids socialize with other kids, so the fact that you continue bringing it up shows that you're either not reading or you're unable.
Are you saying the students don't have the same rights in school that they have on the outside? I didn't know they left their rights on the "school house door".I know plenty about freedom. You don't know much about how schools run, and your examples are positively stupid. Kids DO NOT have the "freedom" to purposely make other kids feel like crap.
I fail to see how anyone can believe that socialising is the only alternative to ostracising.
Ridiculous.
It's possible to acknowledge someone without socialising with them. Is that really so hard to understand?
|
| Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv | Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278 |