Page 5 of 17 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 327

Thread: Students Who Refuse to Affirm Transgender Classmates Face Punishment

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    No, it has to do with the nonsense that people should be immune from emotional upset. Sorry but that's just the way life is. Kids have always broken up into cliques whether it's jocks, nerds, whatever. All the liberal PC do-gooderism does is foster rightful contempt. I mean, it's pretty laughable when we can't even have gym class because the fat kid might get picked last when choosing up teams. Pathetic.
    Uh, no one is saying that kids will be immune from emotional upset. What a stupid lie (I thought Christians weren't supposed to do that.) We still have gym, by the way. Perhaps you could try sticking to the facts rather than making things up about liberals? Thanks!

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    Uh, no one is saying that kids will be immune from emotional upset. What a stupid lie (I thought Christians weren't supposed to do that.) We still have gym, by the way. Perhaps you could try sticking to the facts rather than making things up about liberals? Thanks!
    Who has to make up anything? There's nothing secret about the nonsense liberals have pushed in schools for decades. If you weren't concerned about emotional upset, why did you make your "bullying" comment? Bullying is pretty easily identified but you guys go way beyond that. First we had hate speech. What's next? Hate by indifference? Too funny and, as I said, pathetic.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    Who has to make up anything? There's nothing secret about the nonsense liberals have pushed in schools for decades. If you weren't concerned about emotional upset, why did you make your "bullying" comment? Bullying is pretty easily identified but you guys go way beyond that. First we had hate speech. What's next? Hate by indifference? Too funny and, as I said, pathetic.
    Oh yes, only liberal teachers take a stand against kids trying to make the lives of others hell.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    Oh yes, only liberal teachers take a stand against kids trying to make the lives of others hell.
    And I said that where exactly? Or are you simply spouting nonsense? Bullying is readily identifiable. The thing you've described as bullying in this thread is not it.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    And I said that where exactly? Or are you simply spouting nonsense? Bullying is readily identifiable. The thing you've described as bullying in this thread is not it.
    Making someone's life hell by ostracizing them isn't bullying? Apparently you've never worked with teen girls. That's their preferred method of bullying.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,713

    Default

    You cannot force students to be friends with one another.
    My children are my legacy.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    You cannot force students to be friends with one another.
    That's not at all what I am suggesting.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    31,457

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    That's not at all what I am suggesting.
    What precisely are you suggesting? You can talk till you're blue in the face but kids aren't going to include somebody if they don't want to.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    With my family!
    Posts
    76,713

    Default

    I was not sure. But certainly it is the job of educators or whoever works with children to teach tolerance.

    At the same time I must admit I had the best parents. There were ahead of their time.
    My children are my legacy.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Timonium, MD
    Posts
    8,672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    Like I said, you use your adult brain. Ask any teacher and they'd tell you how easy it is to figure out whether kids are bullying or whether there is some other issue going on. Its really not at difficult as you guys seem to be pretending.
    You are turning this into the slippery slope of thought crime. After all, I ignored you for a couple of hours now. Tell me, did I do it because I find you difficult to deal with or did I do it because I was otherwise occupied?

  11. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by veritas View Post
    What precisely are you suggesting? You can talk till you're blue in the face but kids aren't going to include somebody if they don't want to.
    Again, not at all what I have said. I think I've made it clear that as a teacher, I cannot let kids take steps to viciously ostracize other students as a form of bullying. My jaw is on the floor that I'm getting so much push back about this simple concept.

  12. #92
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rael View Post
    You are turning this into the slippery slope of thought crime. After all, I ignored you for a couple of hours now. Tell me, did I do it because I find you difficult to deal with or did I do it because I was otherwise occupied?
    I could not possibly make this any clearer. Taking steps to ostracize another student because you think they are weird and you want to make their life miserable is bullying. Did you do that to me? Of course not. If you had actually read what I have been writing, you'd know I'm not saying that merely ignoring someone is bullying.

  13. #93
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    If there was bullying going on, I would obviously address it, that's part of my job as a teacher. I'm not interested in delving into the land of make believe with you, so let's skip the hypotheticals, shall we?
    No, I like hypotheticals. They make things a lot clearer. Apparently you need things spelled out for you.

    So what would you do if you thought some kids were ignoring a student to be mean? Would you punish them? Would you force them to associate with the student? How would you address it?

  14. #94
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mom49of4 View Post
    I was not sure. But certainly it is the job of educators or whoever works with children to teach tolerance.

    At the same time I must admit I had the best parents. There were ahead of their time.
    I'd imagine that as an educator you'd know what I am talking about. To give a specific example, I have a girl who is a rather weird 5th grader. Other girls in the class refuse to include her in any activities, but plainly talk about their plans in front of her to make her feel badly that she was not included. There is plenty of cruel talking behind her back that goes on too, but all of her teachers know quite clearly when the other girls are torturing her by playing the ignoring game, as I she can say something and nobody hears her.

  15. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    No, I like hypotheticals. They make things a lot clearer. Apparently you need things spelled out for you.

    So what would you do if you thought some kids were ignoring a student to be mean? Would you punish them? Would you force them to associate with the student? How would you address it?
    Hypotheticals don't make things clearer, they allow you to fantasize about absurd situations. When children are bullying I try to find out why, because it is often that they have insecurity issues that need addressing of their own. If a child is being cruel and they have been warned yet choose to continue, I will keep them for detention and call their parents in for a conference. You can't force kids to socialize, but you can make it clear that deliberate bullying will have consequences.

  16. #96
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    Hypotheticals don't make things clearer, they allow you to fantasize about absurd situations. When children are bullying I try to find out why, because it is often that they have insecurity issues that need addressing of their own. If a child is being cruel and they have been warned yet choose to continue, I will keep them for detention and call their parents in for a conference. You can't force kids to socialize, but you can make it clear that deliberate bullying will have consequences.
    You think ostracizing the other kid is bullying yet you recognize that you can't force kids to socialize. Suppose the kid keeps ignoring the other kid? What consequences? Put him back in detention until what? Until he socializes with the other kid?

    You don't know much about freedom do you? You sure don't respect it.

  17. #97
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    You think ostracizing the other kid is bullying yet you recognize that you can't force kids to socialize. Suppose the kid keeps ignoring the other kid? What consequences? Put him back in detention until what? Until he socializes with the other kid?

    You don't know much about freedom do you? You sure don't respect it.
    We shouldn't be teaching kids good manners?
    Nor punishing them if they fail to display them?

  18. #98
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    12,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey 1 View Post
    You think ostracizing the other kid is bullying yet you recognize that you can't force kids to socialize. Suppose the kid keeps ignoring the other kid? What consequences? Put him back in detention until what? Until he socializes with the other kid?

    You don't know much about freedom do you? You sure don't respect it.
    Do you know what ostracizing means? Yes, ostracizing other kids because they are different is bullying, and it should carry a consequence. I've already said you can't make kids socialize with other kids, so the fact that you continue bringing it up shows that you're either not reading or you're unable.

    I know plenty about freedom. You don't know much about how schools run, and your examples are positively stupid. Kids DO NOT have the "freedom" to purposely make other kids feel like crap.

  19. #99
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Naplis
    Posts
    21,280

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmoreteacher View Post
    Do you know what ostracizing means?
    Yes I do. Maybe you don't. It is just more than one person ignoring someone.

    World English Dictionary
    ostracize or ostracise (ˈɒstrəˌsaɪz)

    — vb
    1. to exclude or banish (a person) from a particular group, society, etc
    2. (in ancient Greece) to punish by temporary exile

    Yes, ostracizing other kids because they are different is bullying, and it should carry a consequence. I've already said you can't make kids socialize with other kids, so the fact that you continue bringing it up shows that you're either not reading or you're unable.
    No, I don't understand your circular logic here. If ostracizing other kids is bullying and is a violation that carries a consequence, and you acknowledge that you can't force kids to socialize, how will the parties in violation not be in violation without them being "forced" to socialize with the other kids? Will they be in virtual violation all year?

    I know plenty about freedom. You don't know much about how schools run, and your examples are positively stupid. Kids DO NOT have the "freedom" to purposely make other kids feel like crap.
    Are you saying the students don't have the same rights in school that they have on the outside? I didn't know they left their rights on the "school house door".

  20. #100
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,269

    Default

    I fail to see how anyone can believe that socialising is the only alternative to ostracising.

    Ridiculous.

    It's possible to acknowledge someone without socialising with them. Is that really so hard to understand?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278