Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Top U.S. Scientists Call for Draconian UN Social Engineering

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The City That Reads...But Its Lips Move
    Posts
    2,395

    Default Top U.S. Scientists Call for Draconian UN Social Engineering

    http://thenewamerican.com/tech/envir...al-engineering

    "“Substantial numbers of people will have to alter their existing behaviors to address this new class of global environmental problems,” claim the authors, who include Nobel Prize winners and even the infamous but largely discredited biologist and “population bomb” alarmist Paul Ehrlich. “Alternative approaches are needed when education and persuasion alone are insufficient.”

    In simpler terms, the self-styled arbiters of proper environmental stewardship and human values are seeking to use the force of government — without the consent of the governed, if need be — to radically change people’s thoughts and behavior. If taxpayer-funded propaganda and brainwashing fail to convince enough of the public to submit, coercion in the form of new rules, regulations, fines, and other policies will be needed, the authors claim."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,947

    Default

    Obammy's gonna git your guns...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,855

    Default

    More fear mongering from the Birchers.

    And to think, most paranoia can be treated with a little white pill.

    No more voices in your head telling you what to do, no more tinfoil beanies, no more sleeping with a loaded firearm,...

    Pays yer money, takes yer choice, I guess.

    After all, America is all about freedom of choice.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,061

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheResearcher View Post
    http://thenewamerican.com/tech/envir...al-engineering

    "“Substantial numbers of people will have to alter their existing behaviors to address this new class of global environmental problems,” claim the authors, who include Nobel Prize winners and even the infamous but largely discredited biologist and “population bomb” alarmist Paul Ehrlich. “Alternative approaches are needed when education and persuasion alone are insufficient.”

    In simpler terms, the self-styled arbiters of proper environmental stewardship and human values are seeking to use the force of government — without the consent of the governed, if need be — to radically change people’s thoughts and behavior. If taxpayer-funded propaganda and brainwashing fail to convince enough of the public to submit, coercion in the form of new rules, regulations, fines, and other policies will be needed, the authors claim."

    Why is Paul Ehrlich discredited. The increasing human population will be, if not already, straining food and water resources.


    Nice avatar. Reminded me of this picture:
    http://imgur.com/r/aww/DGw4tTm

    .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    CRM114
    Posts
    18,077

    Default

    "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278