Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: 94 percent of Americans don't know the budget deficit is getting smaller

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,853

    Default 94 percent of Americans don't know the budget deficit is getting smaller

    It's an indisputable fact: The budget deficit is getting smaller.

    continued...

    In fiscal year 2010, which was President Obama's first full fiscal year in office, the budget deficit was $1.3 trillion. In fiscal year 2013, the Congressional Budget Office projects it will be $845 billion. That's a 35 percent decrease in terms of dollars, and it's even bigger—41 percent—if you're tracking the deficit as a share of the GDP. The percentage drop is even bigger—roughly 50 percent—if you start from fiscal year 2009, which overlapped the final year of the Bush presidency and the first year of Obama's.

    But when Bloomberg News commissioned a survey asking Americans whether they believed the budget deficit was growing or shrinking, just six percent answered the question correctly. Ninety-four percent had no clue. And 62 percent actually thought it was getting bigger.

    So the next time you hear a poll about how Americans think it's important to shrink the budget deficit, keep in mind that 94 percent of us don't even know that it's getting smaller.

    .......


    A lie will make it halfway around the world before the truth can get out of bed.

    The Republicans have ya'll convinced that the betaverse is REAL.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    People confuse the deficit w the debt. But it doesn't stop them from having strongly held opinions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    People confuse the deficit w the debt. But it doesn't stop them from having strongly held opinions.
    Show a link to this confusion.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    downtown
    Posts
    699

    Default

    But the national debt keeps rising, so what's your point?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,230

    Default

    Deficit, debt, tomato etc.

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/


    Who Did It, and Why?

    As the clocks below tell us, the debt it still out of control. But to see when and why this started, you might want to click the graph at the right and watch the YouTube debt video. Or get this graph and much more on zFacts' New App (with no ads).
    We Are in Danger! ... but Not from the Debt

    The danger is from the Great Recession that has cost America 10 million jobs. The debt frenzy is making that worse. Take a look (in the graph) at how the debt skyrocketed during World War II. That's how we ended 12 years of Great Depression. This time it's tougher because Reagan and the Bushes ran the debt much higher in good times than it was at the start of WW II. But as Reagan understood, cutting government spending in a recession only makes it worse. Yes, we must pay down the debt, as Clinton was doing, but not while 17 million are out of work. ... more
    http://zfacts.com/p/461.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    The projected budget most likely comes from the president's sequester plan. Which is why Boehner is fine with it as he says it gives him 98% of what he wants.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sage View Post
    Deficit, debt, tomato etc.

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/


    Who Did It, and Why?

    As the clocks below tell us, the debt it still out of control. But to see when and why this started, you might want to click the graph at the right and watch the YouTube debt video. Or get this graph and much more on zFacts' New App (with no ads).
    We Are in Danger! ... but Not from the Debt

    The danger is from the Great Recession that has cost America 10 million jobs. The debt frenzy is making that worse. Take a look (in the graph) at how the debt skyrocketed during World War II. That's how we ended 12 years of Great Depression. This time it's tougher because Reagan and the Bushes ran the debt much higher in good times than it was at the start of WW II. But as Reagan understood, cutting government spending in a recession only makes it worse. Yes, we must pay down the debt, as Clinton was doing, but not while 17 million are out of work. ... more
    http://zfacts.com/p/461.html
    No party has made an effort to pay the debt down, whether in good times or bad. Today is a great day to start paying it down. If this country is so great economically, it'll weather it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    15,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Show a link to this confusion.
    A link? Sorry it's just self evident. Read some of the posts on this board.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    A link? Sorry it's just self evident. Read some of the posts on this board.
    Then show me the posts where people on this board are confusing the deficit with the national debt? I find that hard to believe. Most people can figure out the difference between their annual budget and what their total debt is. You don't give American's much credit ms maggie.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loch Raven Blvd
    Posts
    8,325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    ... the president's sequester plan. .
    Which does nothing to cut spending, only reduces the rate of spending increase.

    Even with the sequester, spending still increases $15 BILLION more this year over last year.

    Only in Washington is this seen as a "drastic, draconian spending cut."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    32,833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzoliberal View Post
    It's an indisputable fact: The budget deficit is getting smaller.

    continued...

    In fiscal year 2010, which was President Obama's first full fiscal year in office, the budget deficit was $1.3 trillion. In fiscal year 2013, the Congressional Budget Office projects it will be $845 billion. That's a 35 percent decrease in terms of dollars, and it's even bigger—41 percent—if you're tracking the deficit as a share of the GDP. The percentage drop is even bigger—roughly 50 percent—if you start from fiscal year 2009, which overlapped the final year of the Bush presidency and the first year of Obama's.

    But when Bloomberg News commissioned a survey asking Americans whether they believed the budget deficit was growing or shrinking, just six percent answered the question correctly. Ninety-four percent had no clue. And 62 percent actually thought it was getting bigger.

    So the next time you hear a poll about how Americans think it's important to shrink the budget deficit, keep in mind that 94 percent of us don't even know that it's getting smaller.

    .......


    A lie will make it halfway around the world before the truth can get out of bed.

    The Republicans have ya'll convinced that the betaverse is REAL.

    Do the same thing using 2007 or 2008 as a base year and get back to us.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Brooklyn!
    Posts
    13,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    No party has made an effort to pay the debt down, whether in good times or bad.
    Stop lying.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Brooklyn!
    Posts
    13,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SemiAuto View Post
    Do the same thing using 2007 or 2008 as a base year and get back to us.
    Wow, a financial crisis led to a massive recession and the deficit went up. Shocking.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy in Mudville View Post
    Stop lying.
    Even when Clinton had a surplus the national debt still rose. I guess you are one of the posters ms maggie was claiming didn't know the difference between the deficit and the national debt.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,387

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan208 View Post
    But the national debt keeps rising, so what's your point?
    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Even when Clinton had a surplus the national debt still rose.
    Due to the interest on the debt.

    Money ain't free.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    Due to the interest on the debt.

    Money ain't free.
    He also didn't put the surplus towards paying down the debt either.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,387

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    He also didn't put the surplus towards paying down the debt either.
    "He?"

    Clinton?

    Clinton increased our debt by about 26% over his 8 years.

    Reagan tripled our debt and Bush doubled it.

    Are ya sure ya wanna talk about Clinton?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Everyone touts the good old days of Bill Clinton and his $400 + billion dollars budget surpluses of 1998,1999 and 2000, oddly enough, didn’t go towards reducing the National Debt except for a short term $30 billion, we can attribute to election posturing, that President Clinton threw at the National Debt in spring of 2000. This miniscule showtime reduction was eclipsed by August of the same year. The debt chart lower on the page shows the debt history in facial year 2000. It was nothing but election year showmanship.

    http://www.free-press.biz/usa/national-debt.htm

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    28,387

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyboy56 View Post
    Everyone touts the good old days of Bill Clinton and his $400 + billion dollars budget surpluses of 1998,1999 and 2000, oddly enough, didn’t go towards reducing the National Debt except for a short term $30 billion, we can attribute to election posturing, that President Clinton threw at the National Debt in spring of 2000. This miniscule showtime reduction was eclipsed by August of the same year. The debt chart lower on the page shows the debt history in facial year 2000. It was nothing but election year showmanship.

    http://www.free-press.biz/usa/national-debt.htm
    AGAIN, Reagan tripled our debt and Bush doubled our debt without paying off one cent.

    Are you sure you want to talk about Clinton not paying off enough of their debt?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    5,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
    "He?"

    Clinton?

    Clinton increased our debt by about 26% over his 8 years.

    Reagan tripled our debt and Bush doubled it.

    Are ya sure ya wanna talk about Clinton?
    That's right wiz kid, Reagan started the US on the path to accumulating a large national debt. And no president since has change the course of the national debt accumulation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278