Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 58

Thread: The sequester drowned my kitten.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Orlando, FL (born and raised in Baltimore)
    Posts
    10,619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SemiAuto View Post
    Not exactly.

    They're mostly cutting the rate of increase.

    The same thing is being done here. By the time all the evil, draconian, kitten drowning, sequesters are done spending will be up and taxes will be up.
    Rate of increase cuts are still cuts

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    33,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by banner1124 View Post
    Rate of increase cuts are still cuts
    That is like saying my diet is working out well because I only gained 9 pounds instead of 10.

    The underlying problem, too much spending, still exists.

    40% larger

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    33,018

    Default

    Changes in spending from sequestration result in new budget projections below the CBO’s baseline projection of spending based on current law. The federal government would spend $3.62 trillion in the first year with sequestration versus the $3.69 trillion projected by CBO. By 2021, the government would spend $5.26 trillion versus the $5.41 trillion projected. Overall, without a sequester, federal spending would increase $1.7 trillion (blue line). Overall, without a sequester, federal spending would increase $1.80 trillion (blue line). With a sequester, federal spending would increase by $1.65 trillion (red line).
    The 'draconian' cuts actually result in a $1.65 trillion increase in spending.

    But my kitten has to drown.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Shire, Eriador, Middle Earth
    Posts
    2,231

    Default

    illustrating the nature of the hysteria

    The president and his party, including Gov. O'Malley, are doing a great job of making it look like this miniscule reduction in the growth of spending is a big crisis. I guess for those whose jobs depend on voters believing they will keep the entitlements coming it is a big crisis.

    No question the sequester is a clumsy, arbitrary way to go about cutting the budget, but if the politicians - and this applies to both parties - had the guts to make actual hard choices based on responsible spending, then it could be done in a more rational way. But something must be done; even beyond the risk our country is placing itself in, it is flat out immoral to saddle our children and grandchildren with the unstable effects of our living beyond our means.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,913

    Default

    Oh, the false indignation!

    Where was all this concern about the deficit when Dubya was putting two wars on the credit card?

    Oh, right...

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    51,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzoliberal View Post
    Oh, the false indignation!

    Where was all this concern about the deficit when Dubya was putting two wars on the credit card?

    Oh, right...
    Where is your indignation now?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    Where is your indignation now?

    Oh dear!

    What should I be indignant about?

    Republicans lying? (again)

    Democrats spending? (again)

    Posters being disgusting towards the First Lady? (again)

    The "sequester" is a bi-partisan fuster cluck.

    The way OUT SHOULD be, but at the moment, it isn't.

    Maybe I'll get indignant about the Republicans refusing Obama's proposals to close fat-cat tax loopholes.

    Oh dear! So much to get indignant about... so little time.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    Why? Because the cuts don't touch SS and Medicare/caid. So more money is going into those areas and the remaining areas--defense and discretionary domestic--get less money.

    Not sure where the spending for 13 is (budget 3.7 I think?), know 12 came in at 3.5T, which was down from 11 and 10.
    Last I saw, the new budget will be $30B more than last year.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ms maggie View Post
    Unfortunately that's not how this sequester thing works. Cuts are across the board, same % for all programs. Would require legislation to give any flexibility to the exec branch to re-allocate funds.

    http://www.ideamoneywatch.com/main/i...d=60&Itemid=72
    Which I have said repeatedly here. All that is needed is a simple bill from congress tha Obama can quicly sign to give agency heads discretion to reallocate funds from one bucket to another.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by banner1124 View Post
    Rate of increase cuts are still cuts
    You missed your calling Banner, you should be a politician.

    Only in government can you get away with that kind of thinking. The government locks up other folks that think that way. At least they used to.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzoliberal View Post
    Oh, the false indignation!

    Where was all this concern about the deficit when Dubya was putting two wars on the credit card?

    Oh, right...
    Uh hmmm. Speaking of those false equilavancies.

    BTW, alot if us were complaing about Bush the drunken sailor. Obama is a drunken admiral.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Northwest of central
    Posts
    16,712

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    Where is your indignation now?
    It's ok now because Dubya did it. Obama has just perfected the art.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    33,018

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    51,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzoliberal View Post
    Oh dear!

    What should I be indignant about?

    Republicans lying? (again)

    Democrats spending? (again)

    Posters being disgusting towards the First Lady? (again)

    The "sequester" is a bi-partisan fuster cluck.

    The way OUT SHOULD be, but at the moment, it isn't.

    Maybe I'll get indignant about the Republicans refusing Obama's proposals to close fat-cat tax loopholes.

    Oh dear! So much to get indignant about... so little time.
    Democrats lying (again)?

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    33,018

    Default

    IOKIADDI

    Or something like that...

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    51,190

    Default

    It seems, though, that even that number might be too big to fully capture the degree of fear-mongering by the administration. As the Washington Post is now reporting, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan actually has no evidence to back up the claim he made on Face the Nation this weekend that “there are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall.” OK, he could point to one example – Kanawha County, West Virginia – but not without adding, “whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know.”

    Democrats don't lie so this must be a lie.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    6,898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by banner1124 View Post
    Rate of increase cuts are still cuts
    Good. The gov't just took 2 percent from everyone who receives a paycheck and it didnt kill the economy...2 percent from govt spending won't hurt the economy either.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the local pub
    Posts
    33,018

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    It seems, though, that even that number might be too big to fully capture the degree of fear-mongering by the administration. As the Washington Post is now reporting, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan actually has no evidence to back up the claim he made on Face the Nation this weekend that “there are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall.” OK, he could point to one example – Kanawha County, West Virginia – but not without adding, “whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know.”

    Democrats don't lie so this must be a lie.

    You'll regret that!!!!

  19. #39
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,913

    Default

    deleted

  20. #40
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    12,913

    Default

    EVERYBODY lies.

    'Just sayin'...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278