Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 55

Thread: "Sequestration" benefiting Our Undocumented Alien Friends

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contumacious View Post
    Are you kidding me ?

    I don't rely on the US Constitution nor on the Founding Fathers for my legal opinion.

    I let the neo-Nazis and KKK bylaws be my guide.

    .
    Okay.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    New story:

    Gary Mead Retired, Did Not Resign, Immigration And Customs Enforcement Says

    ASHINGTON -- Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials insisted on Wednesday that there was no connection between the retirement of Enforcement and Removal Operations Director Gary Mead and the release earlier this week of hundreds of undocumented immigrants from detention.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...tml?1362001623

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    Uh huh

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    R'lyeh
    Posts
    34,665

    Default

    Weird how the mods merged a story about the Repub's new position on the violence against women act but allow this duplicate thread about the sequester.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    White Marsh
    Posts
    28,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy in Mudville View Post
    We don't have open borders.
    Of course we do. If our borders are closed, as you imply, how do we have millions of illegal non-residents?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    White Marsh
    Posts
    28,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contumacious View Post
    Well let me bring a few historical facts to your attention:

    Prior to 1965 - before LBJ created the welfare state - we had open borders with Mexico - there was never a problem. Mexicans would come here , work for a few months and would go back home without a problem.

    .
    And allow me to bring some historical points as well...

    2013 is not the same as "prior to 1965".

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Adjuntas, Puerto Rico, US of A
    Posts
    8,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pepper View Post
    And allow me to bring some historical points as well...

    2013 is not the same as "prior to 1965".
    Allow me to bring some other historical points

    1) There were no Mexican American Legislators voting for LBJ's program;

    2) We should not penalize them for what LBJ and Democrats did in order to acquire the parasitic vote

    .

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    White Marsh
    Posts
    28,933

    Default

    Fair enough, Contumacious, point taken.


    Either way, it's backfired, and now no one, not the White House or the head of Homeland Security is taking responsibility. It was a decision made by nameless "career employees".

    "Detainee populations and how that is managed back and forth is really handled by career officials in the field," Napolitano said.

    The release of hundreds of detainees is done without the top brass' knowledge? That seems odd given the hot button-ness of the issue. Who are these lower level employees and how can they possibly have the authority?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    Shockingly, the number of released has be revised upward:

    WASHINGTON — The Homeland Security Department released from its jails more than 2,000 undocumented immigrants facing deportation in recent weeks due to looming budget cuts and planned to release 3,000 more during March, The Associated Press has learned.

    The newly disclosed figures, cited in internal budget documents reviewed by the AP, are significantly higher than the "few hundred" undocumented immigrants the Obama administration acknowledged this week had been released under the budget-savings process.

    The government documents show that Immigrations and Customs Enforcement released roughly 1,000 undocumented immigrants from its jails around the U.S. each week since at least Feb. 15. The agency's field offices have reported more than 2,000 immigrants released before intense criticism this week led to a temporary shutdown of the plan, according to the documents.


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2792216.html

    Damn what bunch of lying liars.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Que Pasta
    Posts
    30,496

    Default

    Can't keep cutting and cutting and cutting and cutting without some consequence. It saddens me to inform you that there are no magic wands.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    White Marsh
    Posts
    28,933

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zenwalk View Post
    Can't keep cutting and cutting and cutting and cutting without some consequence. It saddens me to inform you that there are no magic wands.
    No kidding. And you can't keep taxing and taxing and taxing, as if thats a magic wand....Austerity is coming. If this works as a wake up call, so be it. We've built a really unstable house of cards with our bloated, wasteful government ways.

    The real story here is that we've released thousands of detainees, many of them felons,(returning after being deported is a felony) and neither the White House or even the person in charge will take credit for it. It seems unnamed lower level employees have an authority that neither the President of the head of Homeland Security are aware of.

    Do you believe that? I don't think you do. That was Sprightly's point.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pepper View Post
    No kidding. And you can't keep taxing and taxing and taxing, as if thats a magic wand....Austerity is coming. If this works as a wake up call, so be it. We've built a really unstable house of cards with our bloated, wasteful government ways.

    The real story here is that we've released thousands of detainees, many of them felons,(returning after being deported is a felony) and neither the White House or even the person in charge will take credit for it. It seems unnamed lower level employees have an authority that neither the President of the head of Homeland Security are aware of.

    Do you believe that? I don't think you do. That was Sprightly's point.
    Exactly.

    "The White House has said it was not consulted about the releases, and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has acknowledged they occurred in a manner she regrets."

    And, again, the funding for these detention centers was already approved. Just something else that the mainstream media will mostly ignore. The reasons are obvious.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Que Pasta
    Posts
    30,496

    Default

    Then you begin to understand across the board cuts are not the way to go?

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zenwalk View Post
    Then you begin to understand across the board cuts are not the way to go?
    Then you continue to ignore the fact that funding was in place and was not being cut. And then you begin to wonder how low level employees are permitted to make such decisions with consulting with their superiors.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Que Pasta
    Posts
    30,496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    Then you continue to ignore the fact that funding was in place and was not being cut. And then you begin to wonder how low level employees are permitted to make such decisions with consulting with their superiors.
    Across the board cuts have these kinds of results. The fact that these sorts of things are happening BEFORE the sequestration even begins should give you a clue.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    50,894

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zenwalk View Post
    Across the board cuts have these kinds of results. The fact that these sorts of things are happening BEFORE the sequestration even begins should give you a clue.
    OMG Never mind. You are being deliberately obtuse.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Que Pasta
    Posts
    30,496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    OMG Never mind. You are being deliberately obtuse.
    I was thinking the same thing only it wasn't me.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Adjuntas, Puerto Rico, US of A
    Posts
    8,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprightly View Post
    Then you continue to ignore the fact that funding was in place and was not being cut. And then you begin to wonder how low level employees are permitted to make such decisions with consulting with their superiors.
    Again the sequestration hype is pure bullshiite.

    99.9%, probably more, of what the federal government does is unconstitutional.

    So actually the cuts do not go deep enough in order to just cover those acts Constitutionally mandated.

    The Federal government has no authority whatsoever to interdict, detain and deport aliens......NONE.

    .

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    49,179

    Default

    You never run out Conty, do ya?

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Adjuntas, Puerto Rico, US of A
    Posts
    8,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bmore_ken View Post
    You never run out Conty, do ya?
    Again the sequestration hype is pure bullshiite.

    99.9%, probably more, of what the federal government does is unconstitutional.

    So actually the cuts do not go deep enough in order to just cover those acts Constitutionally mandated.

    The Federal government has no authority whatsoever to interdict, detain and deport aliens......NONE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
The Baltimore Sun Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Search/Archive | Feedback | Contact Information | DC50tv |
Baltimore Sun | Chicago Tribune | Daily Press | Hartford Courant | LA Times | Orlando Sentinel | Sun Sentinel
The Morning Call | The Virginia Gazette
Baltimore Sun, 501 N. Calvert Street, P.O. Box 1377, Baltimore, MD 21278