Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

baltimoreron

Curtis Painter it is....

20 posts in this topic

Seriously? If the choice is Boller or Painter, I'd take Boller and Boller sucks. If true, I'm praying it's a camp signing and nothing more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's the #3 guy. Nothing to get worked up over. Plus we have the most frickin durable QB in the league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's the #3 guy. Nothing to get worked up over. Plus we have the most frickin durable QB in the league

 

Exactly, if you think about this rationally you will come to the conclusion that he will be the 3rd string QB. No one made a big fuss when Hunter Cantwell was the 3rd string QB during training camp last year, people are reacting because it's Boller and Painter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly, if you think about this rationally you will come to the conclusion that he will be the 3rd string QB. No one made a big fuss when Hunter Cantwell was the 3rd string QB during training camp last year, people are reacting because it's Boller and Painter.

 

Every time I hear or see the name Hunter Cantwell, I think of a shot putter. I guess I'm combining CJ Hunter and Christian Cantwell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dixon is still the best of the 3. Camp QB or not, why not use the best guy? You never know down the road what will happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon is still the best of the 3. Camp QB or not, why not use the best guy? You never know down the road what will happen.

 

Best of the 4. If Flacco goes down I'd rather see Dixon than any of the other three to include Tyrod. Especially now that anti moon just jinxed us with the "durable qb" comment :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of depth at QB in the draft. Hope the Ravens use a 5th or 6th round choice on somebody like Kinne, Lindley or Keenum.

 

The guy from Tech is more Troy Smith than legit QB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lots of depth at QB in the draft. Hope the Ravens use a 5th or 6th round choice on somebody like Kinne, Lindley or Keenum.

 

The guy from Tech is more Troy Smith than legit QB

 

If those guys are ranked high on their board by the 5th or 6th round they will probably draft them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank God they made the correct choice in picking ABB. In case anyone wonders what ABB stands for it is "Anybody but Boller" :eek:;)

 

The thought of that dufus even taking a snap for the practice squad gives me the heebie jeebies. That Peter Brady lookalike plays NFL QB about the same, like a no talent amateur. I hope he finally ends up where he belongs, out of the NFL.

 

On another note, I see several posters on this thread acting like Dennis Dixon is all that, if he was, why would the Stealers let him walk and sign none other than Troy Smith?Nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's the #3 guy. Nothing to get worked up over. Plus we have the most frickin durable QB in the league

 

At one time, Tom Brady was the most frickin durable QB in the league as well. Then he got nailed and tore an acl and was out for the season. It can happen to anyone. That said, I wouldn't spend too much time or money on a backup if I were the Ravens management. Very, very rarely do backups lead a team to the superbowl. If Flacco goes down, the season is over. Every other contender can say the same. You simply want a backup that can get you through a couple of games until your starter might come back from a minor injury. If the starter goes down for the season, that teams season is over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly, if you think about this rationally you will come to the conclusion that he will be the 3rd string QB. No one made a big fuss when Hunter Cantwell was the 3rd string QB during training camp last year, people are reacting because it's Boller and Painter.

 

If I were making the decision, I might have picked Painter too. He has NFL experience which will help Tyrod immensely in addition to taking quality reps in Training Camp and in Preseason.

 

He also showed some accuracy and, if nothing else, will give the WRs balls to catch.

 

It's doubtful that we will see him after August unless they decide to keep a 3rd QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon is still the best of the 3. Camp QB or not, why not use the best guy? You never know down the road what will happen.

 

Who knows but the decision had something to do with our new QB coach. If he does not have to coach up a youngster, perhaps he can spend more time with the starter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know you wanted you see Kyle's wobbly balls, don't lie..... :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dixon is still the best of the 3. Camp QB or not, why not use the best guy? You never know down the road what will happen.

Dixon is the best of the 3 he even beat up on us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on his performance in Indy last year, I think Curtis Painter could easily lose a quarterback competition to an actual can of paint.

 

Kyle Boller, on the other hand, would have been a perfect fit for the Ravens as the backup to Joe Flacco. He's got a big arm and has proven he can win games. He's also a pro-style drop-back guy. If Flacco gets hurt in the middle of the game, Boller is similar enough stylistically, and has a strong enough arm, that you can basically just continue with the same game plan you've been mapping out all week.

 

I know some people in Baltimore probably hear the name "Kyle Boller" and shudder as they flashback to fumbled snaps and so on and so forth. But, look, the idea this time around wasn't to pay him a lot of money and build the team around him, or even let him start. The idea is to have him sit on the bench behind Joe Flacco for a minimal amount of money, and come in and play only if absolutely necessary due to an injury type situation.

 

When it comes to backup quarterbacks, the available pool is thin, and no one in it has the talent or even the (minimal) accomplishments Kyle Boller has. Signing Curtis Painter instead strikes me as a public relations move- in the sense that the Ravens probably thought it would have been bad public relations to bring Boller back in any capacity. Bringing Boller backup would have been the right move for the team, though, and in my view they should have done it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At one time, Tom Brady was the most frickin durable QB in the league as well. Then he got nailed and tore an acl and was out for the season. It can happen to anyone. That said, I wouldn't spend too much time or money on a backup if I were the Ravens management. Very, very rarely do backups lead a team to the superbowl. If Flacco goes down, the season is over. Every other contender can say the same. You simply want a backup that can get you through a couple of games until your starter might come back from a minor injury. If the starter goes down for the season, that teams season is over.

 

and peyton was pretty durable for a heck of a lot of years as well........

 

but hey, we got painter now, same insurance as the colts had ........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Based on his performance in Indy last year, I think Curtis Painter could easily lose a quarterback competition to an actual can of paint.

 

Kyle Boller, on the other hand, would have been a perfect fit for the Ravens as the backup to Joe Flacco. He's got a big arm and has proven he can win games. He's also a pro-style drop-back guy. If Flacco gets hurt in the middle of the game, Boller is similar enough stylistically, and has a strong enough arm, that you can basically just continue with the same game plan you've been mapping out all week.

 

I know some people in Baltimore probably hear the name "Kyle Boller" and shudder as they flashback to fumbled snaps and so on and so forth. But, look, the idea this time around wasn't to pay him a lot of money and build the team around him, or even let him start. The idea is to have him sit on the bench behind Joe Flacco for a minimal amount of money, and come in and play only if absolutely necessary due to an injury type situation.

 

When it comes to backup quarterbacks, the available pool is thin, and no one in it has the talent or even the (minimal) accomplishments Kyle Boller has. Signing Curtis Painter instead strikes me as a public relations move- in the sense that the Ravens probably thought it would have been bad public relations to bring Boller back in any capacity. Bringing Boller backup would have been the right move for the team, though, and in my view they should have done it.

 

Did you watch his "wonderful" performance against the Chiefs last year in which he threw not one, not two, but three first half interceptions. Painter is the third string QB and Boller would have filled the same role, they still believe in Tyrod as the 2nd string QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dixon got lucky as the Ravens/Steelers don't play til late in the season. If they played the games early, Dixon may not have made the team. He will be used in that game for his knowledge of the Steelers offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Camp arms don't worry me. Dixon would be a defector I'd entertain late as he would get our playbook way too early. The desperation will be paramount and obvious for the defunct steelmiller's this season. Knowing our playbook wouldn't be advisable if we had to cut Dixon. Good move to recognize it before making life easier for a foe. At least Dixon knows we may have legit interest when we cut down the roster.

 

If we could have added him (after the draft) to our practice squad makes more sense. And only added him on the actives in a crunch could help alittle as far as anti espionage/sabotage/subversion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites