Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jeebus

Hillary Clinton Fired From Watergate Committee for Fraud, Ethics Violations

32 posts in this topic

The former general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary during the Watergate investigation, says her history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

 

A lifelong Democrat, Mr. Zeifman supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.'

 

Why? "Because she was a liar," Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.'

 

'My own reaction was of regret that, when I terminated her employment on the Nixon impeachment staff, I had not reported her unethical practices to the appropriate bar associations.'

 

Adding to her lies about cattle trading, sniper fire at the Bosnian airport, Travelgate, Vince Foster, Benghazi--now revelations about her lying during Watergate.

 

So its pretty obvious she was scum long before she became a Clinton.

 

Leftist POS trash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's official

 

Soulflower will defend any leftest Demmie regardless of the charge or whoever is the leftist Demmie.

 

Even when the charge comes from a fellow Demmie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The story is old, but its true, and Hillary does have a history of ethics issues.

 

Given that, it might not be enough to stop the first woman to be elected president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's official. The RWNJs are petrified of a Hillary 2016 candidacy...

 

Now that's funny stuff!!!

 

They all better did a bit deeper because if she runs, she walks in...

 

Actually, the GOP's chances of regaining the WH lie somewhere between slim and none...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Digging up an article from 2008. No collaboration. Oy.

 

Truth is the ultimate defense. This is a true story.

 

Or are you lying about the truthfulness of the article?

 

Of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Truth is the ultimate defense. This is a true story.

 

Or are you lying about the truthfulness of the article?

 

Of course.

 

 

 

It's true that is what this fella claims. Again, collaboration? The briefs he claims Hillary filed--got those for instance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/17/nyregion/17hillary.html?_r=0

Quote

For more than a decade
, one piece of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s informal biography has been that she was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, the conqueror of Mount Everest. The story was even recounted in Bill Clinton’s autobiography.

 

But one big hole has been poked in the story over the years, both in cyberspace and elsewhere: Sir Edmund became famous only after climbing Everest in 1953. Mrs. Clinton, as it happens, was born in 1947.

End Quote

 

Fantastic liar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Watergate happened in 2008?

 

Her first presidential run did. It's just a continuation of conservatives soiling themselves in fear at the thought of her becoming president.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What were the specifics of her firing? In the work place today surfing internet site at work can be unethical behavior.

 

Read the article, the man who fired her clearly states the reason.

 

Hillary and others on the Committee, including former senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation by stealing Judiciary Committee files on the only precedent case that could have stonewalled their plot and drafting a legal brief that, according to Mr. Ziefman, "was so fraudulent and ridiculous Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge."

 

So she's a liar AND a thief. Not to mention a cattle-trading genius named after Edmund Hillary who survived gunfire on the Bosnia Airport ramp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A lifelong Democrat, Mr. Zeifman supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.'

Newsmax publishes samples from this "lifelong Democrat:"

Former Democratic Chief Counsel: Ted Kennedy Disgraced Himself

 

Nancy Pelosi Should Resign

 

Democrats Should Throw Pelosi Out

 

Ann Coulter Deserves Praise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Newsmax publishes samples from this "lifelong Democrat:"

Former Democratic Chief Counsel: Ted Kennedy Disgraced Himself

 

Nancy Pelosi Should Resign

 

Democrats Should Throw Pelosi Out

 

Ann Coulter Deserves Praise

 

Ad hominem.

 

Description of Ad Hominem

 

Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."

 

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

 

Person A makes claim X.

Person B makes an attack on person A.

Therefore A's claim is false.

 

Is what he did and said about Hillary re Watergate true or false.

 

That is the only question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Newsmax publishes samples from this "lifelong Democrat:"

Former Democratic Chief Counsel: Ted Kennedy Disgraced Himself

 

Nancy Pelosi Should Resign

 

Democrats Should Throw Pelosi Out

 

Ann Coulter Deserves Praise

 

 

Attacking the messenger?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm attacking the value of the OPINION of a messenger who says one thing and does another.

 

Despite the FACT that the so-called "messenger" is actually THE PERSON WHO FIRED HER.

 

Lol, still grasping at the anchor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary has been a bottom feeder since her days at the Rose Law Firm. That doesn't mean she isn't a formidable candidate for President. The mass of her voters will see "Clinton" and "D". That's all that's needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Despite the FACT that the so-called "messenger" is actually THE PERSON WHO FIRED HER.

 

Lol, still grasping at the anchor.

 

So he claims. Pretty sure this fella is dead now. (She left when the impeachment process was over--fired from a temporary job?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites