This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects

2 posts in this topic

Were the crimes of September 11, 2001 solely the work of Osama bin Laden and nineteen troubled young Arabs, or were more powerful people involved? After a decade of investigation, the long-time co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Kevin Ryan, offers an evidence-based analysis of nineteen other suspects.


Although a number of books have demonstrated that the official accounts are false, Another Nineteen takes the next, crucial step toward a new investigation into the crimes of 9/11. With the support of victim's families and leading 9/11 researchers, Ryan examines nineteen suspects who were in position to accomplish major elements of the crimes that still need to be explained. Detailed evidence is presented that reveals how each of the alternative suspects had the means, motive and opportunity to accomplish one or more aspects of the 9/11 events. In light of a forty-year history of deep events and crimes against democracy, Ryan shows how 9/11 fits into the pattern of a deep state operation, how the alternate suspects worked together throughout that history, how each was connected to two men who were in perfect position to coordinate the attacks, and how these suspects can either be charged with 9/11 crimes today or further investigated in focused ways.

The Kevin Ryan paradox: the way to show the 9/11 official story is false is by accepting as much of it as possible

World Trade Center leaseholder Larry Silverstein gets a pass from Ryan.

FULL REPORT:>> The Kevin Ryan paradox: the way to show the 9/11 official story is false is by accepting as much of it as possible | Truth and Shadows



At the time of the 9/11 attack, a dozen PNAC signatories worked in leadership positions at the Pentagon, including members of the Defense Policy Board like Fred Ikle and Richard Perle. It was known that Rumsfeld deferred to Perle on many issues in 2001, sometimes in an obsequious manner. Coincidentally, Shelton Lankford, a leading voice in the call for truth about the Pentagon attack, worked for Ikle and a “who’s who” of Perle associates at Telos Corporation from 1990 to 2002. (p. 158)


Why would Ryan feel the urge to mention this “coincidence?” Is this a subtle stab at Lankford? “He promotes the Pentagon flyover theory, and if that’s not dodgy enough, he worked for Ikle and Telos! Suspicious!!! Could he be an intentional disruptor???“ (Cue the Twilight Zone music.)




Ryan’s book, while it certainly draws enough connections to make any reasonable person raise an eyebrow, nonetheless contains numerous problems of omissions, contradictions, and speculation. I have highlighted a few of these in my review.


While it falls considerably short of a piece of truly superior research like David Ray Griffin’s Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Ryan’s book might serve to crack the door open for a complete neophyte to 9/11 research. For me, that door was cracked open in 2004 when I saw Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, which, on a shallower level, goes into many of the same connections Ryan does: the Carlyle Group, the Saudi Royals, etc.


However, if the shortcomings of Another Nineteen are evident to long-time 9/11 truth activists like me, they should ultimately be of serious concern to all those who seek 9/11 truth.





9-11 Attack on America

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write a book based on paranoia and you'll probably rake in the cash. Another roadside attraction

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites