Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Slidemaster

Ravens sign Steve Smith

12 posts in this topic

We'll see what happens, but I'm not a big fan of this move.  Smith's production dropped significantly last year, in a year where his QB got significantly better.  He is not a young 34.  He has played in a lot of games.   I think they would have been better off sucking it up and paying Boldin last year or committing to going younger here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see what happens, but I'm not a big fan of this move.  Smith's production dropped significantly last year, in a year where his QB got significantly better.  He is not a young 34.  He has played in a lot of games.   I think they would have been better off sucking it up and paying Boldin last year or committing to going younger here.

I don't think they're done at WR - I think they'll still find a way to grab Mike Evans in the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This just shows how dumb they were in letting Boldin get away in the first place. They get a guy who is a year older, not as big, who relies more on what is now, diminished speed.  I also don't see him as the redzone threat that Boldin is. I will never understand the logic in letting Boldin go essentially for nothing as a salary dump, to now have to go out and get an older, inferior replacement. What did they gain by this? I agree he will help the team, but this shouldn't even be necessary, had Ozzie been thinking straight after the superbowl win.

Edited by Baltimore Ravens Lets Go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This just shows how dumb they were in letting Boldin get away in the first place. They get a guy who is a year older, not as big, who relies more on what is now, diminished speed.  I also don't see him as the redzone threat that Boldin is. I will never understand the logic in letting Boldin go essentially for nothing as a salary dump, to now have to go out and get an older, inferior replacement. What did they gain by this? I agree he will help the team, but this shouldn't even be necessary, had Ozzie been thinking straight after the superbowl win.

In retrospect, you are absolutely correct. Still, it's in the past, and getting S Smith was smart. A lot smarter than last year's move to get Stokley.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rate this a "good" rather than "great" signing.  

 

When I first heard about this, I thought "too old, too short".  

 

But he did average 11.6 yards a catch, which isn't exactly world beating, but I think he's a good addition to a solid receiving corps.  And while he is 35, he hasn't missed a lot of time since his injury in 2004.
 If Pitta plays like the Pitta of the 2012-13 playoffs (and doesn't have another broken hip), Marlon Brown keeps improving, T.Smith & Jones keep doing what they've been doing, and S.Smith can put up stats comparable to last year's numbers, this passing game is looking good right now.  "If" being the keyword here, but I'm optimistic.

Edited by JasonM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Solid signing. The slot suits him better at his age and with his size. The Boldin train sailed long ago. No amount of griping is bringing him back. Onward and upward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boldin was a big strong receiver but did have trouble getting open against the best cornerbacks. Steve Smith will bring a Ray Lewis type of attitude to the offense this guys is tough as nails and doesn't back down to anyone on defense. I think he will outperform most of the rookie wr class and this way they can groom a wr for a year and learn from smith and smith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see what happens, but I'm not a big fan of this move.  Smith's production dropped significantly last year, in a year where his QB got significantly better.  He is not a young 34.  He has played in a lot of games.   I think they would have been better off sucking it up and paying Boldin last year or committing to going younger here. 

 

I would disagree on Cam getting significantly better. He through for less yards and did not have a 1000 yard WR on the team. I would say the team was significantly better because they had the best defense in the NFL with Luke leading the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In retrospect, you are absolutely correct. Still, it's in the past, and getting S Smith was smart. A lot smarter than last year's move to get Stokley.

Did they "get" Stokely, or was he just about the only half way chance- to- be credible receiver  left at the time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0