How would any of us know?Unless he has evidence that there is, or soon will be a nuke gap, what would be the rationale for making such a statement, in the first place? I guess it does help to appease and codify his brain-dead worshipers?I've heard it said that the only thing scarier than Trump having his hands on nukes, is Trump having his hands on more nukes.I don't wear "panties"? How about you? I like to "free flow"
What's the matter with spending a few billion more dollars on something we may never need to use?
"Despite campaigning on a platform that endorsed having “a nuclear-free world” in the not so distant future, United States President Barack Obama is overseeing an administration that’s aim has taken another path, the New York Times reported this week.
According to the Times report, an effort to ensure that the antiquated nuclear arsenal being held by the US remains secure has since expanded to the point that upwards of $1 trillion dollars is now expected to be spent on various realms of the project during the next three decades, the likes of which are likely to keep the trove of American nukes intact and do little to discourage other nations from doing differently."
Relax.....it's the obama legacy.