Dinglehopper

Nathaniel Oaks Get Caught!

33 posts in this topic

Whatever.

It matters, because at the end of every workday, someone's waiting for your safe return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It matters, because at the end of every workday, someone's waiting for your safe return.

Too many Chesapeake Employers Insurance commercials. Also, I was just suggesting going to Westview, not riding a skateboard there! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's as you describe, it isn't Westwood, anymore than Golden Ring or Hunt Valley. It's just another shopping center. I get the new model though. 

 

I can't do the skateboard thing, or any of the other stuff I used to do, like water and snow skiing. I do love to ride my bike, and it's amazing but I can do 10 miles in an afternoon with no trouble, but cut the grass on Saturday and I pay for it on Sunday. 

 

Sorry, Nathaniel Oaks.  Typical scum, and like Manny alluded, he was just doing what so many in position have always done. But there should be no second chances here. He obviously didn't change his corrupt ways, because why would he? If that crap meant you loose the power and the position permanently it might be a real deterant. 

 

Is there any argument against a permanent ban from politics if you get caught abusing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's as you describe, it isn't Westwood, anymore than Golden Ring or Hunt Valley. It's just another shopping center. I get the new model though. 

 

I can't do the skateboard thing, or any of the other stuff I used to do, like water and snow skiing. I do love to ride my bike, and it's amazing but I can do 10 miles in an afternoon with no trouble, but cut the grass on Saturday and I pay for it on Sunday. 

 

Sorry, Nathaniel Oaks.  Typical scum, and like Manny alluded, he was just doing what so many in position have always done. But there should be no second chances here. He obviously didn't change his corrupt ways, because why would he? If that crap meant you loose the power and the position permanently it might be a real deterant. 

 

Is there any argument against a permanent ban from politics if you get caught abusing?

Well, Sheila Dixon was prohibited from politics for a time, but it was not a permanent ban, and she was able to run last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Well, Sheila Dixon was prohibited from politics for a time, but it was not a permanent ban, and she was able to run last year.

I feel she shouldn't have been able to occupy public office. Oaks is a perfect example of someone that took advantage of his constituents feelings on redemption, and went on to abuse that sentiment. Will Dixon do the same if given a position? Maybe not, but why even take the risk? There is no shortage of up and comers and thats a good thing, even if it only changes the names on the blotter. Sadly, the new council's first move was a silly proclamation against Trump (deserved, but not worth the time maybe?) but to me it's an indication of maybe future foolishness and nonsense that achieves nothing. I hope I'm dead wrong. I've heard a few of the new members on the C4 show, and they seem seriously invested in helping the city.

Edited by pepper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2017/11/15/nathaniel-oaks-indicted-2/


 

Quote

 

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — Baltimore state lawmaker, Nathaniel T. Oaks, has been indicted on an additional federal charge after authorities say he agreed to help the FBI, then tipped off the person they were investigating.

The latest charge against Nathaniel Oaks comes after authorities say Oaks agreed to help the FBI by recording his conversations with someone they were investigating.

But instead of cooperating with the FBI, Oaks is accused of tipping off the target about the FBI investigation.

He was indicted Wednesday on a charge of obstruction of justice. He was already facing charges of wire fraud, honest services wire fraud, and violations of the Travel Act for reportedly accepting bribes to help businesses.

 

Out of the frying pan and into the fire. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. Nat deserves a hitch in an orange jumpsuit. Just think what he didn't get caught doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/15/2017 at 5:21 PM, retired said:

Good. Nat deserves a hitch in an orange jumpsuit. Just think what he didn't get caught doing.

Two big rules to live by.

  1. Don't mess with Mother Natures
  2. Don't cross the Feds. They will be you like white on rice.

Nat is likely going to spending some time looking at 4 walls for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now