Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Ode2Joy

"Hillary Clinton has a right to be a major voice in American politics — but maybe it's time she moved on"

43 posts in this topic

She could very well be leaving her options open. I really don't think she would win the nomination though. The same reasons not to vote for her still exist. Only now you can add that she lost to Trump. If she does run, I think the other candidates will be merciless, seeing how Sanders might've won if he had gone at her hard from the start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Ode2Joy said:

Hillary is unable to move on.  She'll run again and win the nomination again unless Biden follows through and runs.  He probably will too even at his age. 

I'm going to make an early prediction now and say that the Dem ticket in 2020 will be either Biden/Warren or Biden/O'Malley.  Hillary won't have another white male on her ticket.  Maybe Clinton/Corker if she thinks she has to pick a male.  Corker/O'Malley is another possibility if the oldsters don't fix things again to stop them.

I don't think she'll run again. But she does have an upcoming book to move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Jimmy Jazz said:

She could very well be leaving her options open. I really don't think she would win the nomination though. The same reasons not to vote for her still exist. Only now you can add that she lost to Trump. If she does run, I think the other candidates will be merciless, seeing how Sanders might've won if he had gone at her hard from the start.

Sanders never had a chance.  Only the far left and those who are socialist-leaning because they haven't ever achieved much on their own or are too young to have had to pay taxes and bills to pay for stuff that Sanders wanted others to have for free believe that for the most part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Saticon3 said:

you mean fake news like the deputy AG threatened to quit? 

"Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey ."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-trumps-anger-and-impatience-prompted-him-to-fire-the-fbi-director/2017/05/10/d9642334-359c-11e7-b373-418f6849a004_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.46b16d67232d

Trump changed his story and said it was his own idea, ending the narrative that cast Rosenstein  "as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey", and Rosenstein said he didn't threaten to quit.

He did say he couldn’t work under these conditions, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Fake News? Maybe. Maybe not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ode2Joy said:

Sanders never had a chance.  Only the far left and those who are socialist-leaning because they haven't ever achieved much on their own or are too young to have had to pay taxes and bills to pay for stuff that Sanders wanted others to have for free believe that for the most part. 

I'm not sure Sanders would be much more competent than Trump, although certainly he would have been less corrupt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, hst2 said:

I'm not sure Sanders would be much more competent than Trump, although certainly he would have been less corrupt.

I'm not sure about that.  Socialist Sanders admires the old USSR so much he even honeymooned there and his wife is still under FBI investigation for loan fraud stemming from the college she ran into the ground.  That college wasn't one of those "How to invest and get rich" seminars either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Ode2Joy said:

I'm not sure about that.  Socialist Sanders admires the old USSR so much he even honeymooned there and his wife is still under FBI investigation for loan fraud stemming from the college she ran into the ground.  That college wasn't one of those "How to invest and get rich" seminars either.

This post shows your complete ignorance. I'd ask for a link from you, but I know not to bother. You've been on here for years and it's the same ol'...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, ncbirdfan said:

This post shows your complete ignorance. I'd ask for a link from you, but I know not to bother. You've been on here for years and it's the same ol'...

Your post shows your complete ignorance of reality.  You're wrong on two counts there, buckaroo.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/420228/bernie-sanderss-soviet-honeymoon-john-fund

http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/18/wealthy-socialist-bernie-sanders-again-fails-to-file-senate-ethics-financial-disclosures-on-time/

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/05/08/report-fbi-investigating-bernie-sanders-wife-jane-sanders-bank-fraud/22075766/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, bmorepunk said:

I don't care what she is doing. I'm sure Nickleback has been releasing albums in recent years, but I don't care about it. Both are useless and washed out and the focus of people who can't get their heads out of their butts and think about real things.

Amen to that sir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, bmore_ken said:

Neither can you apparently

Stalk, Ken. Stalk.  Too bad if you and the other Democratic apologists don't like current stories about Hillary or her new super pac that she and Howard Dean formed and are talkin about. 

Hillary is Nickleback, and they both still sell and have very large followings. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, bmorepunk said:

I don't care what she is doing. I'm sure Nickleback has been releasing albums in recent years, but I don't care about it. Both are useless and washed out and the focus of people who can't get their heads out of their butts and think about real things.

And yet, here you are making a number of posts on a thread about Hillary and you're the one bringing up Nickleback, unable to resist and think about something else, proving your own point but pointing in the wrong direction. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Ode2Joy said:

Sanders never had a chance.  Only the far left and those who are socialist-leaning because they haven't ever achieved much on their own or are too young to have had to pay taxes and bills to pay for stuff that Sanders wanted others to have for free believe that for the most part. 

He had a legit chance to beat her in the primary. His problem was he didn't really take his campaign seriously until his upset win in Michigan, when it finally dawned on him that he could actually win. His opening statement at their first debate was about how he thought the whole country was 'sick and tired' of hearing about her emails. That was a mistake. He should've gone after her a little more.

His primary win would've been based less on any specific policy proposals and more on the 'change' theme that he (and Trump) ran on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/19/2017 at 6:58 PM, Ode2Joy said:

Sanders never had a chance.  Only the far left and those who are socialist-leaning because they haven't ever achieved much on their own or are too young to have had to pay taxes and bills to pay for stuff that Sanders wanted others to have for free believe that for the most part. 

Yeah, not really. 

Since you're hung up on "free" stuff and how to pay for, who will be paying for Trump's increase in military spending?  Or how will his tax cuts be paid for considering there certainly isn't enough spending cuts to offset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ivanbalt said:

Yeah, not really. 

 

Yeah, really.  Those who aren't smart or talented enough to win a scholarship or grant should do as others have done if they want an education - plan how to pay for it. 

Just avoid Burlington College if it resurfaces and also know the difference between investment seminars and an actual accredited college. 

Edited by Ode2Joy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Ode2Joy said:

Yeah, really.  Those who aren't smart or talented enough to win a scholarship or grant should do as others have done if they want an education - plan how to pay for it. 

Just avoid Burlington College if it resurfaces and also know the difference between investment seminars and an actual accredited college. 

No surprise you didn't touch on who's going to pay for some of Trump's initiatives. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0