Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
JoyinMudville

Foreign Thug Dictator Spends Hundreds of Thousands at Trump's Hotel Before Visiting the White House

171 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, ms maggie said:

Definition of speculation: The forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.

You said re the market:

"So would you agree it's based on speculation and overall feeling of where things are headed?"

 

Overall feeling of where things are headed?  That's speculation sparky.

Ergo you didn't say the stock market is based on speculation. You said it was based on speculation AND speculation!

😂😂😂😂😂

Ok so everyone know sees you changed what I said,were made aware of it and still won't admit it.

Sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mcorioles said:

He's running his business out of the WH?

"“Go buy Ivanka’s stuff is what I would tell you,” Conway said. “I’m going to give a free commercial here. Go buy it today, everybody.”"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, stevez51 said:

You still can't know for sure. Its all speculation ......

HIS OWN LAWYER ADMITTED IT. My god you people are thick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Ok so everyone know sees you changed what I said,were made aware of it and still won't admit it.

Sad.

 

Changed what you said? I copied it. I did forget this post (again copied)

"You don't believe the S M at the very least would be sluggish if they had no confidence in Trump?

If their speculation told them otherwise?"

There's that pesky word again!

Why don't you copy and paste what you said drove the SM, since you CLEARLY don't think it's basically speculation.

Edited by ms maggie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ms maggie said:

 

Changed what you said? I copied it. I did forget this post (again copied)

"You don't believe the S M at the very least would be sluggish if they had no confidence in Trump?

If their speculation told them otherwise?"

There's that pesky word again!

Why don't you copy and paste what you said drove the SM, since you CLEARLY don't think it's basically speculation.

You're lying.........I never said that.

 

Your post.

"And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

You're lying.........I never said that.

 

Your post.

"And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

You understand your posts don't evaporate, right?

mcorioles     10

  • mcorioles
  • Members
  • 16,290 posts
  2 hours ago, ms maggie said:

Performance, herd instinct primarily.

So Trump doesn't get ALL the credit because it's only been 8 months. Conversely, 8 years, Obama should get all the credit?

So would you agree it's based on speculation and overall feeling of where things are headed?

mcorioles     10

  • mcorioles
  • Members
  • 16,290 posts
  2 hours ago, banner1124 said:

But give him credit for what?  He hasn't actually done a single solitary thing fiscally?  NOTHING has been passed... not a thing.  No president can take credit for the economy or get the blame for the economy, this early into his tenure.  Especially when that president has passed zero fiscal legislation

Of course O gets credit.

Trump gets credit for carrying it on so far.

The "Stock Market Dives After Election" shows the intellectual dishonesty here.

You don't believe the S M at the very least would be sluggish if they had no confidence in Trump?

If their speculation told them otherwise?

 

Now show me where I lied.

Edited by ms maggie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

 

you lied.......

Now ,would like me to explain any further.

Its undeniable....

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

 

you lied.......

Now ,would like me to explain any further.

Its undeniable....

LOL. Oh Sparky. You do amuse.

Last chance: if it's not just speculation, what does drive the market?

Come on, you can do it!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, ms maggie said:

LOL. Oh Sparky. You do amuse.

Last chance: if it's not just speculation, what does drive the market?

Come on, you can do it!!

Are you ok?

I never said that.

Keep doubling down on stupid though.

Do you think if you continue to lie enough it will become true?

 

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Are you ok?

I never said that.

Keep doubling down on stupid though.

Do you think if you continue to lie enough it will become true?

 

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"

OK I'll help you out. 

Stock prices at the most basic level, are driven by expectations of future earnings. Individual company performance and assets--trademarks, technology, talent, market share, brand equity--as well as competitive landscape, industry robustness all play a role. These things are differentiators. 

More generally, and not company specific, i.e. the stock market, are things like inflation/deflation, overall economy, interest rates, political uncertainty, herd mentality, all play a role.  These things are not differentiators and will drive the market in the same direction, with some counter cycle exceptions.

That's probably what you were thinking...

Edited by ms maggie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ms maggie said:

OK I'll help you out. 

Stock prices at the most basic level, are driven by expectations of future earnings. Individual company performance and assets--trademarks, technology, market share--as well as competitive landscape, industry robustness all play a role. These things are differentiators. 

More generally, and not company specific, i.e. the stock market, are things like inflation/deflation, overall economy, interest rates, political uncertainty, herd mentality, all play a role.  These things are not differentiators and will drive the market in the same direction, with some counter cycle exceptions.

That's probably what you were thinking...

No,I'm thinking and know you changed what I said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mcorioles said:

No,I'm thinking and know you changed what I said.

Still doing everything in your power to avoid talking about Trump's ethical lapses and conflicts of interest?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, VOSA said:

Obama did.

He met with such icons of democracy and human rights as Putin, Castro & Xi Jinpin.

Really? President Obama personally profited from these leaders? Do tell.

Edited by EgyptKang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JoyinMudville said:

Still doing everything in your power to avoid talking about Trump's ethical lapses and conflicts of interest?

LOL, hardly .

Would you approve of someone changing what you said in a post?

Why are you defending that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mcorioles said:

LOL, hardly .

Would you approve of someone changing what you said in a post?

Why are you defending that?

I went through the thread, no one changed anything. You're whining because you took a beating, again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Heisenberg said:

I went through the thread, no one changed anything. You're whining because you took a beating, again.

Well we can add you to the list of liars.

Its right here AGAIN.

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"


 

This clearly states I said MORE THAN ONE THING........NOT ONLY. 
 
 
As Ms Maggie lied and said ONLY thats singular.

Can you guys read?

LOL keep doubling down

I love it 

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Well we can add you to the list of liars.

Its right here AGAIN.

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"


 

 
  •  

It wasn't changed in the way some may think. You said based on speculation, she said only speculation.

There was no edit which might be what some are using to argue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Well we can add you to the list of liars.

Its right here AGAIN.

My post....

So would you agree it's based on speculation AND  OVERALL FEELING OF WHERE THINGS ARE HEADED?

Your post ....

And no I don't agree it's ONLY speculation. (Think that's an odd word choice given the definition of actual speculation in markets.)"


 

This clearly states I said MORE THAN ONE THING........NOT ONLY. 
 
 
As Ms Maggie lied and said ONLY thats singular.

Can you guys read?

LOL keep doubling down

I love it 

So nothing was actually changed - she just misinterpreted what you did say (or so you claim). Thanks for clearing that up.

Maggie did respond and say that "overall feelings" is just cute wordplay for "speculation" anyway. It would be nice if you could elaborate on what you mean instead of just attacking everyone who tries to engage with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Heisenberg said:

So nothing was actually changed - she just misinterpreted what you did say (or so you claim). Thanks for clearing that up.

Maggie did respond and say that "overall feelings" is just cute wordplay for "speculation" anyway. It would be nice if you could elaborate on what you mean instead of just attacking everyone who tries to engage with you.

LMAO....,you know what?

She lied

I gave her the chance to correct it ....instead she doubled down.

Your last sentence is perfect....except shouldn't the ACCUSER ask what I meant on the second part instead of ASSUMING?

You have it backwards as usual.

If she misinterpreted it why didn't she just say so?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, stevez51 said:

It wasn't changed in the way some may think. You said based on speculation, she said only speculation.

There was no edit which might be what some are using to argue.

The AND part means there were 2 different points.

She says all the time how good she is at spelling ,punctuation,etc.

Yet she used the word ONLY.

When made aware of it doubled down.

Watch.....next it will be "let it go" or some other nonsense instead of just correcting it.

I made a similar mistake that Bmore Ken made me aware of and I apologized?

Whats the big deal?

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, mcorioles said:

LOL, hardly .

Would you approve of someone changing what you said in a post?

Why are you defending that?

So, you tried to change the topic, got spanked by Ms Maggie, and now you are sobbing about it. Meanwhile, you're still not discussing Trump's ethical lapses and conflicts of interest. Why are you even on this thread? It makes you look like a troll

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JoyinMudville said:

So, you tried to change the topic, got spanked by Ms Maggie, and now you are sobbing about it. Meanwhile, you're still not discussing Trump's ethical lapses and conflicts of interest. Why are you even on this thread? It makes you look like a troll

Not at all.

Stop being silly and deflecting.

She lied,was given the chance to be an adult and instead doubled down.

Funny how you won't address it,hypocrite.

Basic English ONLY - singular changing my post

                        AND- plural what I said.Meanng NOT ONLY.

She lied,the end.

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mcorioles said:

Not at all.

Stop being silly and deflecting.

She lied,was given the chance to be an adult and instead doubled down.

Funny how you won't address it,hypocrite.

Basic English ONLY - singular changing my post

                        AND- plural what I said.Meanng NOT ONLY.

She lied,the end.

Still waiting to hear what other than speculation/overall feelings you think drives the market....

Oh and for bonus points: elucidate the difference between "speculation" and "overall feelings".

Go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ms maggie said:

Still waiting to hear what other than speculation/overall feelings you think drives the market....

Oh and for bonus points: elucidate the difference between "speculation" and "overall feelings".

Go.

You never asked,that's also part of the problem

lifting restrictive policy,they see Trump as pro business,things like that.

Everyone except you goofs thinks Trump is good for the economy.

Trust me if people in the know didn't think that the SM wouldn't be where it is now,sorry it's not all Obama.

Funny how Zens idiotic "SM Dives After Election" had all of 

you salivating and piling on.

So when that happened it was all Trump but not now.......

Got It.

GO.

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mcorioles said:

You never asked,that's also part of the problem

lifting restrictive policy,they see Trump as pro business,things like that.

Everyone except you goofs thinks Trump is good for the economy.

Trust me if people in the know didn't think that the SM wouldn't be where it is now,sorry it's not all Obama.

Funny how Zens idiotic "SM Dives After Election" had all of 

you salivating and piling on.

So when that happened it was all Trump but not now.......

Got It.

GO.

Actually,

everyone in the know doesn't think trump is good for the economy. Most people with any background and economics think his views on tariffs, if implemented, would be very damaging to our economy. And most intelligent people think his talk about bringing Cole jobs back his idiotic

everyone in the know also realizes that we're at the back end of a historically long bull market and that we're due for a correction

Edited by JoyinMudville

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0