Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RalR

The Slimy Business of the Russia-gate HOAX

17 posts in this topic

President Trump was correct 

Nothing burger

 

Total HOAX 

 

 

https://consortiumnews.com/2017/09/28/the-slimy-business-of-russia-gate/

Special Report: As the U.S. government doles out tens of millions of dollars to “combat Russian propaganda,” one result is a slew of new “studies” by “scholars” and “researchers” auditioning for the loot, reports Robert Parry.

 

By Robert Parry

The “Field of Dreams” slogan for America’s NGOs should be: “If you pay for it, we will come.” And right now, tens of millions of dollars are flowing to non-governmental organizations if they will buttress the thesis of Russian “meddling” in the U.S. democratic process no matter how sloppy the “research” or how absurd the “findings.”

 

So, we are now in a phase of Russia-gate in which NGO “scholars” produce deeply biased reports and their nonsense is treated as front-page news and items for serious discussion across the MSM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We tried to tell them.

 

Looks like its time soon to start digging up all the "collusion" and impeachment threads.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... Roger Stone and everything. You guys must be getting desperate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JoyinMudville said:

Wow... Roger Stone and everything. You guys must be getting desperate.

Classic projection

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Classic projection

Projection? He has a tattoo of Nixon on his back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

http://theantimedia.org/fbi-informant-threatened-clinton-foundation-russian-bribery/

 

http://truepundit.com/

Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley asked the attorney of a former FBI informant Wednesday to allow her client to testify before his committee regarding the FBI's investigation regarding kickbacks and bribery by the Russian state controlled nuclear company that was approved to purchase twenty percent of United States uranium supply in 2010, Circa has learned.

In a formal letter, Grassley, an Iowa Republican, asked Victoria Toensing, the lawyer representing the former FBI informant, to allow her client, who says he worked as a voluntary informant for the FBI, to be allowed to testify about the "crucial" eyewitness testimony he provided to the FBI regarding members of the Russian subsidiary and other connected players from 2009 until the FBI's prosecution of the defendants in 2014.

Toensing's client was an American businessman who says he worked for four years undercover as an FBI confidential witness. Toensing said he was blocked by the Obama Justice Department, under then Attorney General Loretta Lynch, about testifying to Congress about his time as an informant for the FBI. He contends that he has pertinent information that the Russian's were attempting to gain access to former President Bill Clinton and his wife, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to influence the Obama administration's decision on the purchase of Uranium One, Toensing said.

Edited by RalR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless there’s evidence that the Russians bribed nine different federal agencies plus Obama, I don’t see the point of re-opening these old investigations 

 

Hillary as Sec of State, was one of nine different agencies that had to weigh in on the Uranium deal. 

 

Also, Hillary supported the Keystone Pipeline yet Obama opposed it so there’s not much convincing evidence that Obama supported the deal simply because Hillary signed off on it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, soulflower said:

Unless there’s evidence that the Russians bribed nine different federal agencies plus Obama, I don’t see the point of re-opening these old investigations 

 

Hillary as Sec of State, was one of nine different agencies that had to weigh in on the Uranium deal. 

 

Also, Hillary supported the Keystone Pipeline yet Obama opposed it so there’s not much convincing evidence that Obama supported the deal simply because Hillary signed off on it...

"Re-Opening"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, soulflower said:

Unless there’s evidence that the Russians bribed nine different federal agencies plus Obama, I don’t see the point of re-opening these old investigations 

 

Hillary as Sec of State, was one of nine different agencies that had to weigh in on the Uranium deal. 

 

Also, Hillary supported the Keystone Pipeline yet Obama opposed it so there’s not much convincing evidence that Obama supported the deal simply because Hillary signed off on it...

9 agencies run by Obama appointees?  Tell me Obama couldn't just tell them to approve it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, soulflower said:

Unless there’s evidence that the Russians bribed nine different federal agencies plus Obama, I don’t see the point of re-opening these old investigations 

 

Hillary as Sec of State, was one of nine different agencies that had to weigh in on the Uranium deal. 

 

Also, Hillary supported the Keystone Pipeline yet Obama opposed it so there’s not much convincing evidence that Obama supported the deal simply because Hillary signed off on it...

Diversion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, jdsample said:

9 agencies run by Obama appointees?  Tell me Obama couldn't just tell them to approve it.  

He could tell them whatever he likes. If they say no, what’s he gonna do? These aren’t minor bureaucrats. We’re talking the secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, the attorney general, and two others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like a lot of failed threads on the subject.  Deflection?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/29/2017 at 0:06 PM, RalR said:

President Trump was correct 

Nothing burger

 

Total HOAX 

 

 

 

Spot on sport!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0