Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jonsensback

If Michael Flynn's 'crime' is all Robert Mueller has, it is time to move on

163 posts in this topic

Just now, mcorioles said:

And you don't understand the concept of standing behind what you believe.....or do you believe it?

Obviously not since none of you will accept....only deflections and insults as usual.

So predictable.

How dare you!

I am standing by the belief you aren’t honorable.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, songfourone said:

 

Because you aren’t honorable.

What part of that don’t you understand?

LOL.

So I'll play along ...if I'm not " honorable" why does that matter if you believe their was "collusion" and Trump will be impeached?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, songfourone said:

How dare you!

I am standing by the belief you aren’t honorable.

:lol:

And their is your circular argument.

Good, so what we have learned so far is that ........

Joyinmudville

Bmore Ken

NC Birdfan

Songforfour

 

dont believe Donny will be impeached for "collusion" because when something is actually at stake they won't anty up.

 

Good to know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, songfourone said:

How dare you!

I am standing by the belief you aren’t honorable.

:lol:

He's about as honorable as Trump. Birds of a feather...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ncbirdfan said:

He's about as honorable as Trump. Birds of a feather...

Jokes aren't your thing.

Why won't you step up? (Rhetorical)

 

Because you know nothing is there.

 

But instead of just taking your lumps and moving on ......all of you are going to go down with the ship.

 

Then tell us it happened anyway when it's proven there was no " collusion".

 

Feel free to pin that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Jokes aren't your thing.

Why won't you step up? (Rhetorical)

 

Because you know nothing is there.

 

But instead of just taking your lumps and moving on ......all of you are going to go down with the ship.

 

Then tell us it happened anyway when it's proven there was no " collusion".

 

Feel free to pin that.

 

I wasn't joking. Trump has a history of being a corrupt man. I know people personally that he screwed over. Trump also is pushing strongly for a known pedophile as well. If you want to align yourself with him that is fine. But that is not honorable by any means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ncbirdfan said:

I wasn't joking. Trump has a history of being a corrupt man. I know people personally that he screwed over. Trump also is pushing strongly for a known pedophile as well. If you want to align yourself with him that is fine. But that is not honorable by any means.

Innocence of "collusion" has nothing to do with your post,sorry.

 

Your deflections are noted.

 

Will you leave the board if Trump isn't impeached for " collusion". 

Yes or no?

I will leave if he is........see how easy that was for me?

Why do all of you have trouble answering?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Innocence of "collusion" has nothing to do with your post,sorry.

 

Your deflections are noted.

 

Will you leave the board if Trump isn't impeached for " collusion". 

Yes or no?

I will leave if he is........see how easy that was for me?

Why do all of you have trouble answering?

Simple. They don't want to leave the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Joba said:

Simple. They don't want to leave the board.

Exactly.

Transparent like Casper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

And their is your circular argument.

Good, so what we have learned so far is that ........

Joyinmudville

Bmore Ken

NC Birdfan

Songforfour

 

dont believe Donny will be impeached for "collusion" because when something is actually at stake they won't anty up.

 

Good to know

What are you yapping about now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bmore_ken said:

What are you yapping about now?

You know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, bmore_ken said:

What are you yapping about now?

That's the million dollar question. He doesn't even know. :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, songfourone said:

 

 

 

What post did I not stand behind?

Specifically?

 

 

 

You've already told me what I need to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Cameron said:

 

SMH


You fail to comprehend my post.

The LAW is not the words passed by Congress,

The LAW Is not what is signed by the President.

 

The LAW is whatever the Supreme Court says it is.

The Supreme Court held that 18USC793 (your link) requires INTENT (scienter) or it's unconstitutional.

The leading case is Gorin v. US.  

Obviously, Comey knows more about the LAW than you and your "sources."

 

 

BS! Not every statute has to be litigated before the Supreme Court to become law. The irrelevant case you cited was decided in 1941. The statute in my link was decided in 1952, that’s the law that’s applicable. There’s a naval enlistee sitting in jail as we speak that was prosecuted under the 1952 statute. Guess what, intent was never part of the case. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, volperdinger said:

BS! Not every statute has to be litigated before the Supreme Court to become law. The irrelevant case you cited was decided in 1941. The statute in my link was decided in 1952, that’s the law that’s applicable. There’s a naval enlistee sitting in jail as we speak that was prosecuted under the 1952 statute. Guess what, intent was never part of the case. 

You're talking out of your as . .  hat.

OF course not every statue is appealed to the Supreme Court, but for those that are, the Supreme Court is the final word.

DUH!

Post any changes to 793 since 1917 when it became law.

Seriously? :D Your naval enlistee did not intend to take those classified photos? His phone fell open and started spontaneously clicking despite the witnesses who testified that he knew it was prohibited?

Yeah - - they're exactly the same. 

DUH!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ncbirdfan said:

That's the million dollar question. He doesn't even know. :D

 

You know also.

Your avoidance is noted.

Put your money where your mouth is.

LOL.....all of you are so sure of "collusion" and Trumps impeachment but NONE of you will take the bet.

 

Therefore none of you can be taken seriously because none of you obviously actually believe what you post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

coming in kind of late here with all this legal talk, but I'll simply point out that impeachment is not a legal process, and most of the politicians impeached and removed from office did not break the law. They were found to be unfit for the job. There is plenty of evidence on trump for that. He proved that before he was elected.

It won't happen, though. His impeachers are as corrupt as he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mcorioles said:

You know also.

Your avoidance is noted.

Put your money where your mouth is.

LOL.....all of you are so sure of "collusion" and Trumps impeachment but NONE of you will take the bet.

 

Therefore none of you can be taken seriously because none of you obviously actually believe what you post.

With YOU???

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, gonzoliberal said:

With YOU???

 

 

You want in?

LOL, now the "go to" to avoid the bet is because of me......

Transparent as Casper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...but you're not trolling...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, gonzoliberal said:

...but you're not trolling...

 

Another lame go to.

What's  so hard about a yes or no question?

Im in. 

See,easy.

Just proving none of believe it or you wouldn't have s problem backing up your assertions.

Edited by mcorioles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, mcorioles said:

Another lame go to.

What's  so hard about a yes or no question?

Im in. 

See,easy.

Just proving none of believe it or you wouldn't have s problem backing up your assertions.

Everyone knows you wouldn't honor the agreement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Cameron said:

You're talking out of your as . .  hat.

OF course not every statue is appealed to the Supreme Court, but for those that are, the Supreme Court is the final word.

DUH!

Post any changes to 793 since 1917 when it became law.

Seriously? :D Your naval enlistee did not intend to take those classified photos? His phone fell open and started spontaneously clicking despite the witnesses who testified that he knew it was prohibited?

Yeah - - they're exactly the same. 

DUH!

 

His phone fell open etc.? Actually, had you done a nickel’s worth of research on the case, ( it wouldn’t occur to you), the pictures the lowly sailor took on the atomic sub were totall innocuous, but the classified information was in the background. That doesn’t constitute intent. 

Edited by volperdinger
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Heisenberg said:

Everyone knows you wouldn't honor the agreement.

Lame,that excuse gas already been used.

If you guys believed what you posted it wouldn't matter if I honored the agreement or not.

Laughable,like any of you would know if I was honorable or not from posting on a board.

Again for the record no Sun board liberals put up......so shut up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0